Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Dec 20, 2024
Date Accepted: Mar 15, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Correlation Between Technology and Improved Outcomes in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Prospective Study Examining Outcomes for Patients With Depression and Those With Public Insurance

Emerson N, Ferber C, Jackson N, Li J, Tsay E, Styne D, Gottschalk M, Mittelman S, Moscicki AB, Moscicki AB

Correlation Between Technology and Improved Outcomes in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Prospective Study Examining Outcomes for Patients With Depression and Those With Public Insurance

JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e70380

DOI: 10.2196/70380

PMID: 40460446

PMCID: 12151526

Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Technology Correlates with Improved Outcomes for Patients with Depression and Public Insurance

  • Natacha Emerson; 
  • Christopher Ferber; 
  • Nicholas Jackson; 
  • Joshua Li; 
  • Eric Tsay; 
  • Dennis Styne; 
  • Michael Gottschalk; 
  • Steven Mittelman; 
  • Anna-Barbara Moscicki; 
  • Anna-Barbara Moscicki

ABSTRACT

Background:

Introduction: Adherence to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) treatment regimens decreases during adolescence. Comorbid depression is known to potentiate this risk. While use of technological devices for T1DM can improve outcomes, several patient-level variables appear to impact access.

Objective:

We examined whether technology use impacted the association between depression and poorer health outcomes in T1DM. Given established insurance-based disparities based on technology access, we also studied whether the protective effects of T1DM technology differed among publicly and privately insured youth.

Methods:

Data were prospectively collected from pediatric patients with T1DM across three California medical centers. We used regression analyses to examine whether technology use was related to diabetes outcomes, and whether this differed based on depression status and health insurance type.

Results:

Across 1,573 patients aged 12-25 (Mage 15.9, 66.43% non-Hispanic White, 47.0% female), those with a depression diagnosis had a higher HbA1c and more frequent DKA events than those without (p < .01). Patients using both a continuous glucose monitors (CGM) and pump had lower HbA1c levels and fewer DKA events than those using no or one device (p < .01). While youth with public insurance had significantly higher HbA1c levels than those with commercial insurance, this disparity was eliminated in patients who used CGM (p < .05).

Conclusions:

Technology use in pediatric T1DM appears protective, including in youth with a history of depression and/or who are publicly insured. Facilitating access to T1DM technology may be one avenue to reducing outcome disparities. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Emerson N, Ferber C, Jackson N, Li J, Tsay E, Styne D, Gottschalk M, Mittelman S, Moscicki AB, Moscicki AB

Correlation Between Technology and Improved Outcomes in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Prospective Study Examining Outcomes for Patients With Depression and Those With Public Insurance

JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e70380

DOI: 10.2196/70380

PMID: 40460446

PMCID: 12151526

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.