Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology

Date Submitted: Nov 30, 2024
Date Accepted: Jun 12, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Genetic Diversity and Mutation Frequency Databases in Ethnic Populations: Systematic Review

Khan S, Alam M, Qasim I, Khan S, khan W, Mamyrbayev O, Akhmediyarova A, Mukazhanov N, Alibiyeva, Z, Alibiyeva, Z

Genetic Diversity and Mutation Frequency Databases in Ethnic Populations: Systematic Review

JMIR Bioinform Biotech 2025;6:e69454

DOI: 10.2196/69454

PMID: 41342178

PMCID: 12338852

Ethnic-Specific Mutation Frequency Databases: A Systematic Review of Genetic Diversity and Its Implications for Genetic Disorders

  • Shumaila Khan; 
  • Mehmood Alam; 
  • Iqbal Qasim; 
  • Shahnaz Khan; 
  • Wahab khan; 
  • Orken Mamyrbayev; 
  • Ainur Akhmediyarova; 
  • Nurzhan Mukazhanov; 
  • Zhibek Alibiyeva,; 
  • Zhibek Alibiyeva,

ABSTRACT

Background:

National and Ethnic Mutation Frequency Databases (NEMDBs) play a crucial role in documenting gene variations across populations, offering invaluable insights for gene mutation research and the advancement of precision medicine. These databases provide an essential resource for understanding genetic diversity and its implications for health and disease across different ethnic groups.

Objective:

This study systematically evaluates 42 NEMDBs to (a) quantify gaps in standardization (70% non-standard formats, 50% outdated data), (b) propose AI/LOD solutions for interoperability, and (c) highlight clinical implications for precision medicine across NEMDB’s.

Methods:

A systematic approach was employed to assess the databases based on several criteria, including data collection methods, system design, and querying mechanisms. We analyzed the accessibility and user-centric features of each database, noting their ability to integrate with other systems and their role in advancing genetic disorder research. The review also addressed standardization and data quality challenges prevalent in current NEMDBs.

Results:

The analysis revealed significant issues across the databases, with 70% lacking standardized data formats and 60% having notable gaps in the cross-comparison of genetic variations between ethnic groups. Furthermore, 50% of the databases contained incomplete or outdated data, limiting their clinical utility. However, databases developed on open-source platforms such as LOVD showed a 40% increase in usability for researchers, highlighting the benefits of using flexible, open-access systems.

Conclusions:

We propose cloud-based platforms and LOD frameworks to address critical gaps in standardization (70% of databases) and outdated data (50%) alongside AI-driven models for improved interoperability. These solutions prioritize user-centric design to effectively serve clinicians, researchers, and public stakeholders. Clinical Trial: none


 Citation

Please cite as:

Khan S, Alam M, Qasim I, Khan S, khan W, Mamyrbayev O, Akhmediyarova A, Mukazhanov N, Alibiyeva, Z, Alibiyeva, Z

Genetic Diversity and Mutation Frequency Databases in Ethnic Populations: Systematic Review

JMIR Bioinform Biotech 2025;6:e69454

DOI: 10.2196/69454

PMID: 41342178

PMCID: 12338852

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.