Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Nov 27, 2024
Date Accepted: May 1, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring Older Adult’s Views of the Age-Inclusivity of Physical Activity Websites Using the Think Aloud Method: Qualitative Analysis

Clemson V, Grey E, Barnett J, Burfitt E, Gillison F

Exploring Older Adult’s Views of the Age-Inclusivity of Physical Activity Websites Using the Think Aloud Method: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e68951

DOI: 10.2196/68951

PMID: 40536908

PMCID: 12199841

Older adult’s views of the age-inclusivity of physical activity websites: A think aloud study.

  • Veda Clemson; 
  • Elisabeth Grey; 
  • Julie Barnett; 
  • Ella Burfitt; 
  • Fiona Gillison

ABSTRACT

Background:

Older adults are the least active in our society and may face additional barriers to taking part in physical activity to those experienced by younger people as a result of factors such as lower digital literacy and negative stereotypes of ageing.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore how older adults navigate websites that provide access to physical activity opportunities and facilities and make judgements about their suitability.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were embedded within a think-aloud approach. Participants were shown a series of websites and asked to navigate through the website as if they were going to take up what was on offer, articulating their thoughts and comments out loud as they progressed. Participants viewed up to four websites, rotated from a pool of eight including leisure centres, exercise products, gyms or community organisations. Additional questions were asked about perceptions of inclusivity of the websites at the end of the interview. Digital recordings were made and transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflective thematic analysis.

Results:

Nineteen participants (6 male, 13 female) aged between 65 and 84 were recruited from southern England; one third reported having poor digital ability prior to taking part. Three overarching themes relating to the research question were identified; (1) Signals of age-inclusivity, (2) Limiting beliefs, and (3) Confidence in making judgments. Older adults inferred a lot of information about how welcome they would be in physical activity settings from the images and language used on websites. They showed a preference for imagery that was inclusive of age, body shape and physical ability, not only for those depicting older adults themselves. Some adults reported firm views about the type and intensity of physical activity that is appropriate for older adults, and many expressed a specific dislike of gyms, based on both the (young) age of most users, and perceived emphasis towards aesthetic rather than health-related exercise. While most participants could navigate websites successfully, they retained a preference for speaking to staff and visiting venues in order to have confidence in the level of welcome they might receive, and demand of the activity itself.

Conclusions:

Websites providing access to physical activity could be more inclusive of older adults by using more diverse imagery, providing clearer descriptions of the activities on offer along with detail of the level of fitness or ability needed to take part, and providing alternatives to online booking. Additional societal-level approaches to reducing age-limiting self-stereotyping may also be useful in expanding the opportunities for older adults to access mainstream provision for physical activity. Clinical Trial: n/a


 Citation

Please cite as:

Clemson V, Grey E, Barnett J, Burfitt E, Gillison F

Exploring Older Adult’s Views of the Age-Inclusivity of Physical Activity Websites Using the Think Aloud Method: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e68951

DOI: 10.2196/68951

PMID: 40536908

PMCID: 12199841

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.