Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Nov 16, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 9, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Saline for the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Nguyen T, Beljic M, Willison N, Taheri M, Aryan P, Abbott D, Behnia-Willison F

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Saline for the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e68871

DOI: 10.2196/68871

PMID: 40902148

PMCID: 12444214

Platelet-rich plasma vs saline in the treatment of vulvar lichen Sclerosus, Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Tran Nguyen; 
  • Milica Beljic; 
  • Nadia Willison; 
  • Mahshid Taheri; 
  • Pouria Aryan; 
  • Derek Abbott; 
  • Fariba Behnia-Willison

ABSTRACT

Background:

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic relapsing dermatosis commonly affecting the anogenital region in post-menopausal women, though it can affect people of any age and sex. Current gold standard treatment is lifelong topical steroid application to reduce symptoms and prevent of progression of disease causing irreversible architectural change to the vulval tissue. LS is associated with decreased quality of life and increased risk of vulvar neoplasia. Alternatives to current treatments are highly desired by both clinicians and patients. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous blood product containing high concentrations of platelets and growth factors and is hypothesised to promote wound healing. PRP has been reported to improve symptoms of LS in a number of case reports and uncontrolled trials.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of PRP versus saline injections to improve the clinical signs and symptoms of LS.

Methods:

This is a protocol for a 12-month, single-centre, parallel-group, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of PRP for LS compared to saline. Adult female patients with biopsy-proven LS who are otherwise in good health but are non-responders to topical steroid treatment prior to inclusion are eligible for the trial. A total of 68 participants will be randomly allocated via random number generator to receive either PRP or saline injections to areas of the vulva with LS. All participants will be blinded to the intervention received. Participants will be followed up with assessments of clinical LS signs, subjective symptom scores, and quality of life questionnaires at four time points: baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months by blinded assessors. The primary outcome is the Clinical Scoring System for LS – total LS score.

Results:

The study is closed as of September 2024 due to slow recruitment.

Conclusions:

This study was designed as an RCT to fill in the gap in existing literature about the efficacy of PRP for the treatment of vulvar LS. It aims to provide other researchers in this field with a standardised protocol including methods of preparation and injection of PRP, and the use of validated outcome measures assessing both clinical signs of disease and subjective effects of the disease on quality of life. Clinical Trial: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618001321235p. Universal Trial Number: U1111-1207-4893.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nguyen T, Beljic M, Willison N, Taheri M, Aryan P, Abbott D, Behnia-Willison F

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Saline for the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e68871

DOI: 10.2196/68871

PMID: 40902148

PMCID: 12444214

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.