Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Nov 4, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mental Health Professionals’ Technology Usage and Attitudes Toward Digital Health for Psychosis: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Zhang X, Berry N, Di Basilio D, Richardson C, Eisner E, Bucci S

Mental Health Professionals’ Technology Usage and Attitudes Toward Digital Health for Psychosis: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e68362

DOI: 10.2196/68362

PMID: 40163639

PMCID: 11975120

Mental health professionals’ technology usage and attitudes toward digital health for psychosis: A comparative cross-sectional survey study

  • Xiaolong Zhang; 
  • Natalie Berry; 
  • Daniela Di Basilio; 
  • Cara Richardson; 
  • Emily Eisner; 
  • Sandra Bucci

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health technologies (DHTs) for psychosis have been developed and tested rapidly in recent years, and the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the transition to telehealth and digital health. However, research examining mental health professionals’ views on the use of DHTs for people with psychosis is limited. Given the increased accessibility and availability of DHTs for psychosis, an up-to-date understanding of staff perception of DHTs for psychosis is warranted.

Objective:

In this study, we investigated: i) staff technology usage and their perception of service users’ technology usage; ii) staff views towards the use of DHTs for psychosis; and iii) the differences in staff technology usage and views towards the use of DHTs in clinical practice before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

Two cross-sectional surveys were deployed before and after the pandemic. Both surveys were distributed to mental healthcare staff who had experience of working with individuals experiencing psychosis in the UK.

Results:

A total of 155 and 352 participants completed the Phase 1 and Phase 2 surveys respectively. Staff reported high levels of technology ownership and usage. In general, staff expressed positive views regarding the use of DHTs for psychosis; however, barriers and concerns, including affordability, digital literacy, and potential negative effects on service users’ mental health, were also reported. There was no change in staff use of digital technology in clinical practice pre-post pandemic.

Conclusions:

Staff expressed optimism about the potential implementation of DHTs in practice, though they also noted some concerns regarding safety and access. Although the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of digital tools for healthcare, the sustainability of this shift from traditional to digital healthcare has been less than optimal. To promote the implementation of DHTs, systematic evaluation of adverse effects of using DHTs and dissemination of evidence are needed to address concerns staff expressed regarding safety. Organisational support and training should be offered to staff to help address barriers and increase confidence in recommending and utilising DHTs with service users.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhang X, Berry N, Di Basilio D, Richardson C, Eisner E, Bucci S

Mental Health Professionals’ Technology Usage and Attitudes Toward Digital Health for Psychosis: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e68362

DOI: 10.2196/68362

PMID: 40163639

PMCID: 11975120

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.