Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 20, 2024 - Jan 15, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 11, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Employers’ Perspectives of Caregiver-Friendly Workplace Policies for Caregiver-Employees Caring for Older Adults in Hong Kong: Thematic Analysis

Lee MMs, Yeoh EK, Wong ELY

Employers’ Perspectives of Caregiver-Friendly Workplace Policies for Caregiver-Employees Caring for Older Adults in Hong Kong: Thematic Analysis

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e68061

DOI: 10.2196/68061

PMID: 40163861

PMCID: 11997528

Employers Perspectives of Caregiver-Friendly Workplace Policy for Caregiver-Employees' Caring for Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Thematic Analysis

  • Maggie Man-sin Lee; 
  • Eng-Kiong Yeoh; 
  • Eliza Lai-Yi Wong

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hong Kong is experiencing a rapidly ageing population, s0 caregiver- employees in the workplace are not uncommon. However, awareness of such employees is low and caregiver-specific workplace policies are generally unknown. This study is the first in the literature to attempt to capture employers' perspectives on such policies and also their needs in future implementation.

Objective:

The objectives of this study are to identify the support currently provided or could be provided to Caregiver-Employees (CEs) caring for older adults in Hong Kong and the challenges and facilitative support for employers to adopt Caregiver-Friendly Workplace Policies (CFWP) in the specific context of Hong Kong.

Methods:

A qualitative research design with semi-structured individual in-depth interviews with seventeen employers from private, public, and non-governmental organization sectors in Hong Kong was adopted for this study. Thematic framework analysis was used to evaluate the data collected during the interviews.

Results:

Seventeen employers and managers comprising four males (24%) and 13 females (76%) from eight major industries in Hong Kong were interviewed. Four main themes were identified: (1) current support and potential support for CEs, (2) challenges in adopting CFWP, (3) facilitating support for adopting CFWP, and (4) incentives for adopting CFWP. The informants rated information and resources for CEs, bereavement leave, flexible working hours, and caregiver-inclusive corporate culture as the essential CFWP for CEs in Hong Kong.

Conclusions:

While several studies have reported the types of CFWP and their impact on CEs, stakeholders' perspectives on CFWPs are rarely investigated. This study finds that although employers consider CFWP necessary and see it as a catalyst for a long-term win-win situation, the current support for CEs is discretionary and industry-specific. Government leadership is critical for formulating, piloting, and implementing CFWP to create a friendly environment that encourages disclosure with trust and respect across industry sectors in Hong Kong.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lee MMs, Yeoh EK, Wong ELY

Employers’ Perspectives of Caregiver-Friendly Workplace Policies for Caregiver-Employees Caring for Older Adults in Hong Kong: Thematic Analysis

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e68061

DOI: 10.2196/68061

PMID: 40163861

PMCID: 11997528

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.