Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 25, 2024
Date Accepted: May 8, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing the Readability and Quality of Web-Based Resources on Exercise Stress Testing: Cross-Sectional Readability and Quality Analysis

Rahbe M, Mistry D, Khawaja AM, Sous NA, Tso AY

Assessing the Readability and Quality of Web-Based Resources on Exercise Stress Testing: Cross-Sectional Readability and Quality Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e68000

DOI: 10.2196/68000

PMID: 41124565

PMCID: 12543036

Assessing the Readability and Quality of Web-Based Resources on Exercise Stress Testing: A Cross-Sectional Readability and Quality Analysis

  • Munir Rahbe; 
  • Dhrumi Mistry; 
  • Ali M Khawaja; 
  • Natalie A Sous; 
  • Alan Y Tso

ABSTRACT

Background:

Health literacy is a crucial determinant and independent predictor of patient outcomes. To enhance patient understanding across diverse populations, the American Medical Association (AMA) advises that health information be written at a 6th-grade reading level. The exercise stress test is a widely used diagnostic tool, frequently ordered in outpatient settings to assess cardiovascular health. Although numerous studies have evaluated the readability of various cardiovascular health topics, there is a noticeable gap in the literature regarding the readability and quality of health information pertaining to exercise stress tests.

Objective:

The goal of this study was to evaluate the readability and quality of publicly available information regarding exercise stress tests on the Google and Bing search engines.

Methods:

Four search terms were entered into both the Google and Bing search engines, and websites containing information pertaining to exercise stress tests were assessed for their readability and quality. Web pages were classified as “academic” or “non-academic” based on whether the publishing website was affiliated with an academic institution. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincade Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) scores, while quality was assessed using the DISCERN criteria. The resulting scores were calculated, and independent sample t-tests were performed to compare the individual scores of the academic and non-academic sources.

Results:

This study assessed 18 websites in total, and the mean grade level (mean ± SD, 8.36 ± 1.32) and reading ease (62.31 ± 6.65) exceeded the current AMA recommendations. Furthermore, the quality of the web pages was determined to be “fair” as per the DISCERN grading criteria. Academic sources had greater FKGL and FRE scores that were additionally found to be statistically significant in comparison to the scores of the non-academic sources with p-values of 0.032, and 0.006, respectively.

Conclusions:

Websites containing information pertaining to exercise stress tests are written at a grade level that exceeds current recommendations, with academic sources being significantly more difficult to read when compared to non-academic sources. The quality of the web pages evaluated in this study was deemed to be fair. However, quality can be improved by including references to sources as well as additional resources for readers seeking more information. Improving readability can be challenging as medical terminology is often intrinsically complex. While substituting or omitting these terms may improve readability, it risks delivering incomplete or oversimplified information to patients.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rahbe M, Mistry D, Khawaja AM, Sous NA, Tso AY

Assessing the Readability and Quality of Web-Based Resources on Exercise Stress Testing: Cross-Sectional Readability and Quality Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e68000

DOI: 10.2196/68000

PMID: 41124565

PMCID: 12543036

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.