Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Oct 18, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 19, 2024 - Dec 14, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 24, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Ecological Momentary Assessment of Parental Well-Being and Time Use: A Mixed-Methods Compliance and Feasibility Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to capture real-time data on well-being and time use in daily life, yet its feasibility in specific, particularly time-strained populations, such as parents, is not well understood.
Objective:
This study examines compliance rates and feasibility of EMA for measuring daily well-being and time use among parents.
Methods:
An explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted with 74 parents who completed baseline and follow-up online questionnaires after completing EMA surveys four times daily over one week, whereby a subset of parents were subsequently interviewed about their experience. Compliance and feasibility were analysed using a combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Results:
Despite several aspects of the study design impeding feasibility—such as difficulties accommodating the 7:30 survey time point and challenges integrating daily surveys into individual routines—participants completed 82.5% of the daily surveys on average. Men showed significantly higher compliance than women. Participants generally found the survey frequency and length manageable, though some suggested longer or shorter study periods depending on their personal routines. Qualitative analysis revealed additional points for improvement, for instance, regarding the data collection format, and technical issues.
Conclusions:
The study demonstrates that, when accounting for certain sociodemographic and study design factors, EMA can be a feasible method for data collection regarding daily well-being and time use, even in highly time-constrained populations like parents, showing great potential for future research and complementing established methods (e.g., retrospective daily diaries). Clinical Trial: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/8qj3d
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.