Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Oct 6, 2024
Date Accepted: Apr 2, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Perception of the Age-Friendliness of Their Environment and the Impact of Loneliness, Technology Use, and Mobility: Quantitative Analysis

Balki E, Hayes N, Holland C

Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Perception of the Age-Friendliness of Their Environment and the Impact of Loneliness, Technology Use, and Mobility: Quantitative Analysis

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e67242

DOI: 10.2196/67242

PMID: 40327856

PMCID: 12093072

Factors associated with older adult perception of age friendliness of their environment; the role played by loneliness, technology use and mobility: A Quantitative Study

  • Eric Balki; 
  • Niall Hayes; 
  • Carol Holland

ABSTRACT

Background:

The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) publication on Age-friendliness of environments (AFE) imagines the future cities to become more age-friendly to harness the latent potential of older adults, especially those who have restricted mobility. AFE has important implications for older adults in maintaining social connections, independence, and successful ageing-in-place. However, technology is notably absent in the eight intersecting domains of AFE that WHO imagines improving older adult wellbeing, and we investigated whether technology should form a ninth domain.

Objective:

Whilst mobility was severely restricted, the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to test how older adults’ perception of their AFE changed and what role technology was playing. Our study examined how Life Space Mobility (LSM), a concept for assessing patterns of functional mobility over time, and loneliness, impacted perceived AFE and the moderating effect of technology. It also explores whether technology should play a greater role as the ninth domain of WHO’s imagination of AFE’s of the future.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional quantitative observation study, data from 92 older adults aged 65-89 years were collected in England during March 2020 to June 2021, during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Life-space Questionnaire, Technology Experience Questionnaire, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and Age-Friendly Environment Assessment Tool (AFEAT) were used. Correlation and moderation analyses were used to investigate relationships between variables.

Results:

Most participants (>93%) had not left their immediate town in previous 4 weeks from interview. Restricted LSM was positively correlated to AFEAT, i.e., rising physical isolation was linked to better perception of AFE; however, we discovered this result was due to the moderating impact of increased use of technology, and that restricted LSM actually had a negative effect on AFE. Loneliness was correlated negatively with perception of AFE, but technology use was found to moderate the impact of loneliness.

Conclusions:

Pandemic-related LSM restrictions impacted perceived AFE and loneliness negatively, but technology played a moderating role. Findings demonstrate that technology could be considered as a ninth domain in WHO’s assessment of AFE for older adults, and that there is a need for its explicit acknowledgement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Balki E, Hayes N, Holland C

Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Perception of the Age-Friendliness of Their Environment and the Impact of Loneliness, Technology Use, and Mobility: Quantitative Analysis

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e67242

DOI: 10.2196/67242

PMID: 40327856

PMCID: 12093072

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.