Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Oct 4, 2024
Date Accepted: May 27, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perceptions of Adults Aged 50 Years and Older Regarding the Use of Wearable mHealth Technologies to Promote Physical Activity: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography

Rodríguez-Martín B, González-Arroyo D, Priego-Jiménez S, Lopez-González M, Medrano-Echeverría M, Carolina Ruiz-Grao M, Álvarez-Bueno C

Perceptions of Adults Aged 50 Years and Older Regarding the Use of Wearable mHealth Technologies to Promote Physical Activity: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e67157

DOI: 10.2196/67157

PMID: 42525576

PMCID: 13420493

The perceptions of adults over 50 regarding the use of wearable mHealth technologies to promote physical activity: a meta-ethnography.

  • Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín; 
  • Diego González-Arroyo; 
  • Susana Priego-Jiménez; 
  • María Lopez-González; 
  • María Medrano-Echeverría; 
  • Marta Carolina Ruiz-Grao; 
  • Celia Álvarez-Bueno

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite the advancement of mHealth apps and the importance of adapting them to users, little is known about their perceptions of older adults.

Objective:

To synthesize and analyze studies that explore the perceptions of adults aged 50 and above regarding areas to improve, barriers to and facilitators of mHealth applications to promote physical activity.

Methods:

This was a qualitative systematic review of meta-ethnography-type articles published from 2013 to January 2014 at Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library Plus, ProQuest, and CSIC, both in English and Spanish, according to the PRISMA Declaration.

Results:

Ten articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed via meta-ethnography. Three main themes emerged: 1) barriers to promoting physical activity caused by mHealth apps: personal barriers (physical aspects, perceptions about technology, likes/preferences), technological barriers (functionality, content, design, alarms, availability and accessibility), and environmental barriers (season of the year); 2) personal facilitators (consideration that these apps improve health, perceptions about technology, likes/preferences), technological facilitators (functionality, content, design), relational facilitators (technological and social support), environmental facilitators (seasons of the year) and healthcare professionals (support and monitoring by healthcare services); and 3) personal areas (perceptions about technology, likes/preferences), technological areas (functionality, content and design), and relational areas (technological support).

Conclusions:

Although older adults acknowledge that mHealth apps have the potential to promote physical activity, they declare that they find personal, technological and environmental barriers to using them. There is a need for age-friendly apps adjusted to the preferences and preferences of this kind of user. Likewise, it is crucial to bridge the digital gap and to provide app users with support from healthcare professionals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rodríguez-Martín B, González-Arroyo D, Priego-Jiménez S, Lopez-González M, Medrano-Echeverría M, Carolina Ruiz-Grao M, Álvarez-Bueno C

Perceptions of Adults Aged 50 Years and Older Regarding the Use of Wearable mHealth Technologies to Promote Physical Activity: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e67157

DOI: 10.2196/67157

PMID: 42525576

PMCID: 13420493

PDF not available

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.