Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Oct 1, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 1, 2024 - Nov 26, 2024
Date Accepted: Apr 15, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Prevention and Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) significantly affects young individuals' social and academic functioning, emphasising the need for accessible and effective treatments such as digital mental health interventions (DMHI).
Objective:
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DMHI for children, adolescents and young adults with social anxiety.
Methods:
For review and meta-analysis databases were searched for randomised controlled trials investigating DMHI addressing social anxiety in young people (mean age <25 years). Two authors independently screened the records, extracted data and assessed the Risk of Bias.
Results:
This systematic review includes k=22 and the meta-analysis k=21 studies. Results significantly favoured DMHIs (g=0.508; 95% CI: 0.308; 0.707) over any control condition (i.e., waitlist or active interventions) after the intervention, specifically those compared to waitlist control conditions (g=0.576; 95% CI: 0.343; 0.809), based on cognitive behavioural principles (g=0.610; 95% CI: 0.361; 0.859), incorporating SAD-specific components (g=0.878; 95% CI: 0.469; 1.278) and those with human guidance (g=0.825; 95% CI: 0.425; 1.224). Neither parental involvement nor age influenced outcomes significantly. When publication bias was considered, the overall effect remained significant (g=0.506 (95% CI= 0.308; 0.707).
Conclusions:
This meta-analysis provides support for the efficacy of DMHI for social anxiety compared to no intervention and the beneficial effects of guidance and interventions specifically designed for SAD. Further, it highlights methodological shortcomings and heterogeneous reporting standards. Future research should prioritise higher methodological quality and should explore how effects are related to age and specific intervention components, including guidance and treatment modules. Clinical Trial: This systematic review and meta-analysis was preregistered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023424181).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.