Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 26, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 5, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of a Novel Goals-of-Care Discussion Priming Tool (MyCare) in Inpatient General Internal Medicine Ward Settings: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study

Kimura M, Ruller S, Forster A, Downar J, Isenberg SR, Steinberg L, Wilson K, Shaffer VA, Wegier P, Myers J, Goldman R, Steele Gray C, Kobewka D

Evaluation of a Novel Goals-of-Care Discussion Priming Tool (MyCare) in Inpatient General Internal Medicine Ward Settings: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66932

DOI: 10.2196/66932

PMID: 41151041

PMCID: 12605267

Feasibility and acceptability of a novel Goals of Care clarification and conversation priming tool on an in-patient general internal medicine ward: A Mixed-Methods Study

  • Maren Kimura; 
  • Sydney Ruller; 
  • Alan Forster; 
  • James Downar; 
  • Sarina R Isenberg; 
  • Leah Steinberg; 
  • Kumanan Wilson; 
  • Victoria A Shaffer; 
  • Pete Wegier; 
  • Jeff Myers; 
  • Russell Goldman; 
  • Carolyn Steele Gray; 
  • Daniel Kobewka

ABSTRACT

Background:

For seriously ill patients, conversations about prognosis, values, and goals can improve person-centered care but these conversations do not happen consistently.

Objective:

We developed an online, interactive goals of care discussion priming tool called MyCare to facilitate conversations about patient goals between doctors, patients, and family members. Our objective was to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of MyCare for seriously ill patients in hospital.

Methods:

We conducted a mixed methods study on internal medicine wards with seriously ill patients at two hospitals. Participants completed MyCare with a research assistant in their hospital room and responses were sent to their attending physician team. Patients, family members, and physicians participated in semi-structured interviews to assess advance care planning engagement, usability, and acceptability. Patients completed the system usability scale (SUS).

Results:

MyCare had moderate usability (SUS 64.7/100). The most useful elements for patients were: 1) clarifying goals and wishes for care, 2) identifying people who support them, and 3) having something to help facilitate conversations with their families. The most useful elements for physicians were seeing patients’ prioritized values and goals. Acceptability and usability could be improved by reducing the length of the tool and removing questions patients felt redundant, or instead increasing free-text spaces for patients to communicate their thoughts more clearly.

Conclusions:

MyCare and similar tools will be more usable and acceptable if they are short, simple, focus on shared doctor-patient priorities, and empower patients to advocate for their own goals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kimura M, Ruller S, Forster A, Downar J, Isenberg SR, Steinberg L, Wilson K, Shaffer VA, Wegier P, Myers J, Goldman R, Steele Gray C, Kobewka D

Evaluation of a Novel Goals-of-Care Discussion Priming Tool (MyCare) in Inpatient General Internal Medicine Ward Settings: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66932

DOI: 10.2196/66932

PMID: 41151041

PMCID: 12605267

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.