Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Sep 24, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 25, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

AIFM-ed Curriculum Framework for Postgraduate Family Medicine Education on Artificial Intelligence: Mixed Methods Study

Tolentino R, Hersson-Edery F, Yaffe M, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S

AIFM-ed Curriculum Framework for Postgraduate Family Medicine Education on Artificial Intelligence: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e66828

DOI: 10.2196/66828

PMID: 40279148

PMCID: 12064963

AIFM-ed Curriculum Framework for Family Medicine Postgraduate Education on Artificial Intelligence: a mixed methods study

  • Raymond Tolentino; 
  • Fanny Hersson-Edery; 
  • Mark Yaffe; 
  • Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi

ABSTRACT

Background:

As healthcare moves to a more digital environment, there is a growing need to train future family doctors on the clinical uses of Artificial Intelligence (AI). However, family medicine training in AI has often been inconsistent or lacking.

Objective:

To develop curriculum framework for family medicine postgraduate education on AI called “Artificial Intelligence for Family Medicine” (AIFM-ed).

Methods:

First, we conducted a comprehensive scoping review on existing AI education frameworks guided by methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley, and Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping reviews. We adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting the results. Next, two national expert panels were conducted. Panelists included family medicine educators and residents knowledgeable in AI from family medicine residency programs across Canada. Participants were purposively sampled, and panels were held via Zoom, recorded, and transcribed. Data was analyzed using content analysis. We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research for panels.

Results:

An integration of the scoping review results and two panel discussions of 14 participants led to the development of the AIFM-ed curriculum framework for AI training in postgraduate family medicine education with five key elements: 1) need and purpose of the curriculum, 2) learning objectives, 3) curriculum content, 4) organization of curriculum content and 5) implementation aspects of the curriculum.

Conclusions:

Using the results of this study, we developed the AIFM-ed curriculum framework for AI training in postgraduate family medicine education. This framework serves as a structured guide for integrating AI competencies into medical education, ensuring that future family physicians are equipped with the necessary skills to use AI effectively in their clinical practice. Future research should focus on the validation and implementation of the AIFM-ed framework within family medicine education. Institutions also are encouraged to consider adapting the AIFM-ed framework within their own programs, tailoring it to meet the specific needs of their trainees and healthcare environments.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tolentino R, Hersson-Edery F, Yaffe M, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S

AIFM-ed Curriculum Framework for Postgraduate Family Medicine Education on Artificial Intelligence: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e66828

DOI: 10.2196/66828

PMID: 40279148

PMCID: 12064963

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.