Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Serious Games

Date Submitted: Aug 20, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effects of a Session of Exergames and Traditional Games on Inhibitory Control in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

Miranda JM, Browne RAV, Silva WQAd, Rodrigues dos Santos JP, Campbell CSG, Ramos IA

Effects of a Session of Exergames and Traditional Games on Inhibitory Control in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e65562

DOI: 10.2196/65562

PMID: 40052243

PMCID: 11900902

Effects of a Session of Exergames and Traditional Games on Inhibitory Control in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Crossover Trial

  • Juliana Macedo Miranda; 
  • Rodrigo Alberto Vieira Browne; 
  • Weslley Quirino Alves da Silva; 
  • João Paulo Rodrigues dos Santos; 
  • Carmen Silvia Grubert Campbell; 
  • Isabela Almeida Ramos

ABSTRACT

Background:

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is characterized by deficits in executive functions, such as inhibitory control, which affect behavior and social adaptation. Although physical activity-based interventions, such as exergames, have shown potential to improve these functions, their comparative effects with active traditional games remain underexplored, particularly regarding inhibitory control in children with ASD.

Objective:

To analyze the effects of a session of exergames and active traditional games on inhibitory control in children with ASD.

Methods:

This randomized crossover trial included nine male children with ASD (mean age: 8.6 ± 1.4 years). Participants completed three 20-minute experimental sessions in random order, with a minimum interval of 48 hours: (1) active traditional games, (2) exergames using Just Dance 2022, and (3) a control session with manual painting activities. Inhibitory control was assessed 5 minutes post-session using a modified Flanker Task in the E-Prime v.3.0 program, recording reaction time (RT) and accuracy in congruent and incongruent phases. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare RT and accuracy between experimental and control conditions. Data are presented as means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results:

There was a statistically significant effect of condition on RT in the incongruent phase (P=.02). RT in the exergame session (849 ms; 95% CI: 642, 1057) was lower compared to the traditional games (938 ms; 95% CI: 684, 1191; P=.02) and control (969 ms; 95% CI: 742, 1196; P=.01) sessions. No significant differences were observed in RT during the congruent phase or in accuracy across either phase.

Conclusions:

A 20-minute session of exergame improved inhibitory control performance in children with ASD compared to active traditional games and painting activities. Clinical Trial: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC; protocol No. RBR-5r9xzbq)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Miranda JM, Browne RAV, Silva WQAd, Rodrigues dos Santos JP, Campbell CSG, Ramos IA

Effects of a Session of Exergames and Traditional Games on Inhibitory Control in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e65562

DOI: 10.2196/65562

PMID: 40052243

PMCID: 11900902

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.