JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

The phenomenon of procrastination refers to an individual's conscious decision to postpone the completion of tasks despite being aware of its adverse consequences in the future. Extant research in this field shows that procrastination is associated with increased levels of anxiety, stress, and the likelihood of developing depression and calls for the development of suitable interventions that support individuals in making lasting positive changes to their procrastination behaviors. In parallel, practice has produced a plethora of behavior change support systems (BCSS) that aim to provide a low-threshold, accessible alternative to in-person therapeutic approaches. Most of these BCSS can be considered motivational BCSS that combine functional, utilitarian components with hedonic and eudaimonic design elements to empower self-treatment. Although first studies have suggested the potential benefits of such BCSS, research on understanding their specific design characteristics and support of individuals in self-treating procrastination is still in its infancy.

Objective:

In response to this gap between practice and research, we aim to analyze and systemize the multitude of practical design efforts in motivational BCSS for the self-treatment of procrastination and identify the main design archetypes that have emerged.

Methods:

We conducted a three-step research approach. First, we identified 127 behavior change support applications against procrastination through a systematic screening process. Secondly, we systematically coded the identified applications in terms of the behavior change techniques targeted by their functional design and hedonic or eudaimonic design elements. Thirdly, we conducted a two-step cluster analysis to identify archetypes of motivational design in behavior change support applications to combat procrastination.

Results:

A variety of motivational designs have been developed and implemented in practice, and our analysis identifies five main archetypes: (1) structured progress monitor, (2) self-improvement guide, (3) productivity adventure, (4) emotional wellness coach, (5) social focus companion. The identified archetypes target different psychological determinants of procrastination and successfully employ a variety of hedonic and eudaimonic design elements that extend beyond the current state of research.

Conclusions:

The results of our study provide a foundation for future research endeavors that aim to examine the comparative effects of motivational design archetypes and to develop more effective interventions tailored to individual needs. For practitioners, the findings reveal the contemporary design space of motivational BCSS to support the self-treatment of procrastination and may serve as blueprints that can guide the design of future systems. For individuals seeking support and health professionals treating procrastination, our study systemizes the landscape of applications, thereby facilitating the selection of an application that best aligns with the patient’s individual needs.