Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2024
Date Accepted: Apr 3, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Persuading People to Do Good: Effects of Facebook Status Updates on Blood Donation Attitudes and Behavior
ABSTRACT
Background:
Social media platforms have demonstrated significant potential in influencing behaviors and have become the cornerstone for many public health and agency efforts. Blood collection agencies have embraced social media for the recruitment and retention of donors, as well as to encourage donation-related behaviors. Regular day-to-day social media status updates constitute a large part of the communication strategies employed by blood banks.
Objective:
Despite the promise of social media for behavior change, the evidence for the persuasive effects of day-to-day social media status updates remains scant, not only in the realm of blood donation, but across all health domains. We therefore examine long term attitudinal and behavioral outcomes to understand the impact of organizations social media page efforts on (health) behavior.
Methods:
We conducted a randomized controlled trial where we invited all newly registered blood donors to participate in our study to investigate the effects of a blood bank's Facebook page on donation attitudes and behavior. Participants (N = 1,891) were randomized to either the experimental or the control group. Participants were randomly assigned either to follow a blood bank's Facebook page or not. This 2 (new Facebook followers, non-Facebook follower) x 2 (pre-measure, post-measure) mixed design with an additional observational arm (current Facebook followers, N = 415) varied between and within participants and results were measured at two and twelve months after participation.
Results:
After one year, no interaction effects (group x time) for attitudinal variables were found (attitude towards blood donation; intention to donate; attitude towards blood bank; warmth; competence; donorship contemplation; contemplating the blood bank. The experiment group was 32% more likely to have made a first donation (OR: 1.32, CI: 1.01-1.73) compared to the control group. Similarly, the experiment group made 12% more whole blood and 17% more total blood donations after one year compared to the control group (resp. IRR:1.12, CI: 1.01-1.24; IRR:1.17, CI: 1.06-1.28).
Conclusions:
After one year, no interaction effects (group x time) for attitudinal variables were found (attitude towards blood donation; intention to donate; attitude towards blood bank; warmth; competence; donorship contemplation; contemplating the blood bank. The experiment group was 32% more likely to have made a first donation (OR: 1.32, CI: 1.01-1.73) compared to the control group. Similarly, the experiment group made 12% more whole blood and 17% more total blood donations after one year compared to the control group (resp. IRR:1.12, CI: 1.01-1.24; IRR:1.17, CI: 1.06-1.28).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.