Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jul 30, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 12, 2024 - Oct 7, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 6, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Baseline Smartphone App Survey Return in the Electronic Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Omni 1 Study: eCohort Study

Rong J, Pathiravasan CH, Zhang Y, Faro JM, Wang X, Schramm E, Borrelli B, Benjamin EJ, Liu C, Murabito JM

Baseline Smartphone App Survey Return in the Electronic Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Omni 1 Study: eCohort Study

JMIR Aging 2024;7:e64636

DOI: 10.2196/64636

PMID: 39740111

PMCID: 11706443

Baseline Smartphone App Survey Return in a new eCohort of Older Adults: The eFHS Offspring and Omni 1 Study

  • Jian Rong; 
  • Chathurangi H. Pathiravasan; 
  • Yuankai Zhang; 
  • Jamie M. Faro; 
  • Xuzhi Wang; 
  • Eric Schramm; 
  • Belinda Borrelli; 
  • Emelia J. Benjamin; 
  • Chunyu Liu; 
  • Joanne M. Murabito

ABSTRACT

Background:

Smartphone applications (apps) can be used to monitor chronic conditions and offer opportunities for self-assessment conveniently at home. However, few digital studies include older adults.

Objective:

To describe a new electronic cohort (eCohort) of older adults embedded in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) including baseline smartphone survey return rates and survey completion rates by smartphone type (iPhone and Android users). To report survey results for selected baseline surveys and participant experience with the study app.

Methods:

FHS Offspring and Omni (multi-ethnic cohort) participants who owned a smartphone were invited to download the study app that contained a range of survey types to report on different aspects of health including self-reported measures from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). iPhone users also completed four cognitive and physical function testing tasks. Baseline survey return and completion rates were calculated for 12 surveys and compared between iPhone and Android users. We calculated standardized scores for the PROMIS surveys. The Mobile App Rating Survey (MARS) was deployed 30 days after enrollment to obtain participant feedback on app functionality and aesthetics.

Results:

We enrolled 611 smartphone users (average age 73.6±6.3 years, 56.6% women, 14.4% Omni participants, 77% iPhone users) and 596 (97.5%) returned at least one baseline survey. iPhone users had higher app survey return rates than Android users for each survey (range 85.5 to 98.3% vs 73.8 to 95.2% respectively), but survey completion rates did not differ in the two smartphone groups. The return rate for the four iPhone tasks ranged from 80.9% for the Gait task to 88.9% for the Trail Making Test task. The eFHS participants had better standardized T-scores in six of seven PROMIS surveys compared to the general population mean (T-score =50) including higher cognitive function (55.6) and lower fatigue (45.5). Among 469 participants who returned the MARS survey, app functionality and aesthetics was rated high (total MARS score = 8.6 on a 1-10 scale).

Conclusions:

We effectively engaged community-dwelling older adults to use a smartphone app designed to collect health information relevant to older adults. High app survey return rates and very high app survey completion rates were observed along with high participant rating of the study app.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rong J, Pathiravasan CH, Zhang Y, Faro JM, Wang X, Schramm E, Borrelli B, Benjamin EJ, Liu C, Murabito JM

Baseline Smartphone App Survey Return in the Electronic Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Omni 1 Study: eCohort Study

JMIR Aging 2024;7:e64636

DOI: 10.2196/64636

PMID: 39740111

PMCID: 11706443

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.