Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 28, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 22, 2024 - Sep 16, 2024
Date Accepted: Dec 9, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Nurses’ Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study

Walzer S, Schoen I, Pfeil J, Schepputat S, Ziegler S, Schmoor C, Kunze C

Nurses’ Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e64444

DOI: 10.2196/64444

PMID: 39908092

PMCID: 11840387

Nurses' Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study

  • Stefan Walzer; 
  • Isabel Schoen; 
  • Johanna Pfeil; 
  • Sam Schepputat; 
  • Sven Ziegler; 
  • Claudia Schmoor; 
  • Christophe Kunze

ABSTRACT

Background:

Technology that detects when a patient at risk for falls is out of bed early can support nurses in acute care hospitals.

Objective:

To develop a better understanding of nurses' perspectives and experiences regarding a bed exit information system (BES) in an acute care hospital setting.

Methods:

BES was implemented in three wards of a university medical center. Nurses completed two surveys at each time point, P0 and P1, using an online questionnaire and participated in focus groups before (P0) and after (P1) implementation. Additional patient information was collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the surveys, and content analysis was used for the focus group data. The respective rates of patients and adverse events in both phases were compared using negative binomial models. Reporting of this study followed the GRAMMS checklist.

Results:

30 questionnaires were completed at P0 (42%) and 24 at P1 (33%). 15 participants completed both questionnaires (complete cases). At P1, 64% of participants agreed that their workload in caring for cognitively impaired patients was reduced by the use of the BES. The adverse event rate per cognitively impaired patient per day was reduced by a factor of 0.613, 95% CI [0.393, 0.955], p=0.0305. In addition, 11 nurses participated in four focus groups before and after the intervention. Participants found it challenging to operationalize the use of the BES due to the heterogeneity of care settings, but certain behaviors of cognitively impaired patients were recognized as indicating a need for intervention. Negative experiences included information overload and alarm fatigue, leading to occasional removal of the system.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the challenges of caring for cognitively impaired patients in acute care hospitals, consistent with existing research. The BES studied proved beneficial in certain situations, but only moderately reduced nurses' workload. To maximize the benefits of BES, an algorithm for its appropriate use should be developed. Future research should include both objective and subjective factors to fully understand their impact on nurses' workload, emphasizing collaboration with nurses in healthcare innovation management. The results of this study may help to better realize the potential of such technologies and improve their implementation. Clinical Trial: The study was registered in the German Register for Clinical Studies (ID: DRKS00021720).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Walzer S, Schoen I, Pfeil J, Schepputat S, Ziegler S, Schmoor C, Kunze C

Nurses’ Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e64444

DOI: 10.2196/64444

PMID: 39908092

PMCID: 11840387

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.