Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 22, 2024 - Sep 16, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 5, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

Vives N, Binefa G, Travier N, Farre A, Panera JA, Casas B, Vidal C, Ibáñez-Sanz G, Garcia M, M-TICS research group

Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e64243

DOI: 10.2196/64243

PMID: 39742454

PMCID: 11736219

Text message reminders cannot replace but can improve the effect of postal reminders to increase participation in colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial

  • Nuria Vives; 
  • Gemma Binefa; 
  • Noemie Travier; 
  • Albert Farre; 
  • Jon Aritz Panera; 
  • Berta Casas; 
  • Carmen Vidal; 
  • Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz; 
  • Montse Garcia; 
  • M-TICS research group

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mobile phone text message reminders to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation have shown moderate effects.

Objective:

We assessed the effectiveness of text messages as a replacement for routine postal reminders in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia.

Methods:

We conducted a randomized controlled trial among individuals aged 50 to 69 invited to screening who had not completed FIT within six weeks. The intervention group (n=12,167) received a text message reminder, and the control group (n=12,221) used the standard procedure (reminder letter). The primary outcome was a participation rate within 18 weeks of the invitation. The trial was discontinued, and a recovery strategy was implemented by sending a reminder letter to non-participant individuals from the intervention group. We performed a final analysis to determine the impact of the recovery strategy.

Results:

Interim analysis (n=7095) showed a lower participation rate among non-participants within six weeks in the text message group compared to the control group (16.4% vs. 20.9%, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63–0.81). A total of 7591 non-participants in the text message group received a second reminder by letter, reaching a participation rate of 23%. Final analysis (n=24,388) showed that the intervention group, which received two reminders, had higher participation than the control group (29.3% vs. 26.5%, OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09–1.23).

Conclusions:

Our attempt to replace reminder letters with text messages was unsuccessful, but receiving two reminders significantly increased participation rates among non-participants within six weeks compared to one postal reminder. Additional research is essential to determine the best timing and frequency of reminders to boost participation without being intrusive in their choice of participation. Clinical Trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04343950, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04343950 (04/09/2020).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Vives N, Binefa G, Travier N, Farre A, Panera JA, Casas B, Vidal C, Ibáñez-Sanz G, Garcia M, M-TICS research group

Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e64243

DOI: 10.2196/64243

PMID: 39742454

PMCID: 11736219

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.