Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 17, 2024 - Sep 11, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 15, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Shaping Public Perceptions of a Range of Robotic Technologies in Surgery: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey

Shen S, Xie D, Ding A, Zhang L, Creighton F

Factors Shaping Public Perceptions of a Range of Robotic Technologies in Surgery: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e64224

DOI: 10.2196/64224

PMID: 41264790

PMCID: 12633834

Factors Shaping Public Perceptions of a Range of Robotic Technologies in Surgery: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey

  • Sarek Shen; 
  • Deborah Xie; 
  • Andy Ding; 
  • Lisa Zhang; 
  • Francis Creighton

ABSTRACT

Background:

Within the surgical field, there has been an evolution in the application of robotic technology. Semi-autonomous robotic systems and augmented visualization tools are being introduced and may eventually replace existing surgical extenders, such as the da Vinci surgical system. However, little is known about the public perception of these newer technologies within medical care.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to investigate public perceptions toward robotic surgeries with varying levels of autonomy through a technology acceptance model.

Methods:

An online survey was distributed via the Amazon MTurk platform. Survey participants were provided definitions of robotic surgical extenders: technology without independent actions; semi-autonomous robotic surgery: technology that provides guidance to the surgeon and requires surgeon input; and fully autonomous robotic surgery: technology which performs tasks autonomously without direct human interaction. The survey assessed attitudes towards each application of robotic technology in surgery. Structural equation models were built to identify associations between perceived usefulness, social risk, time risk, personal risk, and reliability with overall attitudes towards robotic surgeries.

Results:

A total of 1221 survey responses were recorded (age 38±12 years, 52% female). Individuals were more willing to accept robotic surgical extenders and semi-autonomous robotic surgery compared to autonomous robotic surgery. Higher levels of education and better self-reported health were correlated with more positive attitudes towards robotic surgery. Perceptions of these technologies were not associated with age or income. Overall, attitudes towards robotic technologies in surgery were driven by views on their reliability, safety, and efficiency.

Conclusions:

The public is more accepting of semi-autonomous surgery and surgical extenders than fully autonomous surgery. Overall attitudes appear to be driven by perceptions of the reliability, safety, and efficiency of these technologies. Understanding these perspectives can help guide patient education within an advancing surgical field.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shen S, Xie D, Ding A, Zhang L, Creighton F

Factors Shaping Public Perceptions of a Range of Robotic Technologies in Surgery: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey

JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e64224

DOI: 10.2196/64224

PMID: 41264790

PMCID: 12633834

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.