Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Jun 21, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 9, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Remote Monitoring of Cryosurgery Response Using a Smartphone App: Prospective Study

Weir V, Cowen EA, Salvador T, Sun MD, Gu L, Gillis MC, Kurtansky NR, Rotemberg V, Halpern AC

Remote Monitoring of Cryosurgery Response Using a Smartphone App: Prospective Study

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e63467

DOI: 10.2196/63467

PMID: 41849641

Remote Monitoring of Response to Cryosurgery: A Prospective Study Using a Smartphone Mobile App

  • Vanessa Weir; 
  • Emily A. Cowen; 
  • Trina Salvador; 
  • Mary D. Sun; 
  • Lilly Gu; 
  • Maura C. Gillis; 
  • Nicholas R. Kurtansky; 
  • Veronica Rotemberg; 
  • Allan C. Halpern

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cryotherapy is an effective treatment for benign lesions, although current unstandardized approaches may result in inadequate response and unwanted side effects. Monitoring treatment characteristics, lesion response, and patient-reported outcomes using patient-derived mobile imaging may allow for data to be collected in the future for treatment monitoring.

Objective:

To determine reliability of metrics for assessing response to cryotherapy in actinic and seborrheic keratoses using remote photographic monitoring.

Methods:

Patients were enrolled who were recommended cryotherapy by their physician for treating seborrheic and/or actinic keratoses (N = 22 patients, N= 31 lesions). After treatment, participants took an “overview” and “close up” photo of their lesion(s) and rated appearance, pain, and degree bothered on a custom smartphone application at eight post-treatment timepoints (Day 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, 30, 60, 90). After study completion, independent raters scored images for local skin response (erythema, scaling, crust, swelling, vesiculation, erosion), cosmetic outcome (hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, scarring, atrophy), and lesion resolution.

Results:

Local skin response peaked on post-cryotherapy Day 3, with 26% of patients reporting pain. There was substantial agreement between raters for lesion resolution (κ: 0.71 [0.62-0.79]), erythema (κ: 0.66 [0.57, 0.74]), and local skin response index (κ: 0.69 [0.61, 0.77]) as measured by quadratic weighted Cohen's Kappa. Overall, 77% of submitted photos were good quality, and most image derived metrics had higher agreement in good quality compared to poor quality photos. Peak local skin response had a moderate positive association with lesion response at 90 days (r = 0.556, p=.01, spearman).

Conclusions:

This study shows the utility of patient self-imaging for achieving longitudinal assessment of response to cryotherapy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Weir V, Cowen EA, Salvador T, Sun MD, Gu L, Gillis MC, Kurtansky NR, Rotemberg V, Halpern AC

Remote Monitoring of Cryosurgery Response Using a Smartphone App: Prospective Study

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e63467

DOI: 10.2196/63467

PMID: 41849641

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.