Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Date Submitted: Jun 9, 2024
Date Accepted: Aug 6, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Association of a Novel Electronic Form for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment With Reduction in Cardiac Consultations and Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study

Kumar M, Wilkinson K, Li YH, Masih R, Gandhi M, Saadat H, Culmone J

Association of a Novel Electronic Form for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment With Reduction in Cardiac Consultations and Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Perioper Med 2024;7:e63076

DOI: 10.2196/63076

PMID: 39269754

PMCID: 11437228

Novel electronic form for preoperative cardiac risk assessment is associated with reduction in cardiac consultations and testing: A Retrospective cohort study

  • Mandeep Kumar; 
  • Kathryn Wilkinson; 
  • Ya-Huei Li; 
  • Rohit Masih; 
  • Mehak Gandhi; 
  • Haleh Saadat; 
  • Julie Culmone

ABSTRACT

Background:

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is an integral part of preoperative evaluation; however, there is significant variation among providers, leading to inappropriate referrals for cardiology consultation or excessive low-value cardiac testing. We implemented a novel electronic medical record (EMR) form in our preoperative clinics to decrease variation.

Objective:

Investigate the impact of the EMR form on the preoperative utilization of cardiology consultation and cardiac diagnostic testing (echocardiograms, stress tests, and cardiac catheterization) and evaluate postoperative outcomes.

Methods:

Retrospective cohort study of elective surgical patients who underwent outpatient preoperative evaluation over 2 years divided into two cohorts: July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022 (pre-EMR form implementation) and July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023 (post-EMR form implementation). Demographics, comorbidities, resource utilization, and surgical characteristics were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences between the two cohorts. The primary outcomes were utilization of preoperative cardiology consultation, cardiac testing, and 30-day postoperative major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Results:

25,484 patients met inclusion criteria. Propensity score-matching yielded 11,654 well-matched pairs. The post-EMR matched cohort had lower cardiology consultation [pre = 2698 (23.2%) vs. post = 2088 (17.9%), p <0.001] and echocardiogram [pre = 808 (6.9%) vs. post = 591 (5.1%), p <0.001] utilization. There were no significant differences in the 30-day postoperative outcomes, including MACE. While patients with “Possible indications for cardiology consultation had higher MACE rates, the consultations did not reduce MACE risk. Most algorithm endpoints, except for active cardiac conditions, had MACE rates < 1%.

Conclusions:

In this cohort study, preoperative cardiac risk assessment using a novel EMR form was associated with a significant decrease in cardiology consultation and testing utilization, with no adverse impact on postoperative outcomes. Adopting this approach may assist perioperative medicine clinicians and anesthesiologists in efficiently decreasing unnecessary preoperative resource utilization without compromising patient safety or quality of care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kumar M, Wilkinson K, Li YH, Masih R, Gandhi M, Saadat H, Culmone J

Association of a Novel Electronic Form for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment With Reduction in Cardiac Consultations and Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Perioper Med 2024;7:e63076

DOI: 10.2196/63076

PMID: 39269754

PMCID: 11437228

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.