Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Infodemiology
Date Submitted: Jun 4, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 22, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Beliefs in misinformation about COVID-19 and the Russian invasion of Ukraine are linked: evidence from a nationally representative survey
ABSTRACT
Background:
Detrimental effects of misinformation were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presently, amid Russia’s military aggression in Ukraine, another wave of misinformation is spreading on the internet and impacting our daily lives, with many citizens and politicians embracing Russian propaganda narratives. Despite the lack of an objective connection between these two societal issues, anecdotal observations suggest that supporters of misinformation regarding COVID-19 (BM-C) have also adopted misinformation about the war in Ukraine (BM-U), while sharing similar media use patterns and political attitudes.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a link between respondents’ endorsement of the two sets of misinformation narratives, and whether some of the selected factors (media use, political trust, vaccine hesitancy, belief rigidity) are associated with both BM-C and BM-U.
Methods:
We conducted a survey on a nationally representative sample of 1,623 individuals in the Czech Republic. Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to identify the relationship between BM-C and BM-U. Additionally, multiple linear regression was used to determine associations between the examined factors and both sets of misinformation.
Results:
We discovered that (1) BM-C and BM-U were strongly correlated (rho=0.636) and both were associated with belief rigidity. (2) Increased trust in Russia and decreased trust in the local government, public media, and Western allies of the Czech Republic predicted both BM-C and BM-U. (3) Media use indicating frustration from and avoidance of public/mainstream media, consumption of alternative information sources, as well as participation in online discussions indicative of epistemic bubbles, predicted beliefs in misinformation narratives. (4) COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy predicted only BM-C but not BM-U. However, vaccine refusers were overrepresented in the BM-U supporters and undecided individuals.
Conclusions:
Our study provides empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the health-related misinformation surrounding COVID-19 pandemic has been politicized and spread via specific media channels. Subsequently, supporters of BM-C were susceptible to political misinformation aligning with Russian propaganda.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.