Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 17, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 8, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring Laypersons’ Experiences With a Mobile Symptom Checker App as an Interface Between eHealth Literacy, Health Literacy, and Health-Related Behavior: Qualitative Interview Study

Koch R, Steffen MT, Wetzel AJ, Preiser C, Klemmt M, Ehni HJ, Mueller R, Joos S

Exploring Laypersons’ Experiences With a Mobile Symptom Checker App as an Interface Between eHealth Literacy, Health Literacy, and Health-Related Behavior: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e60647

DOI: 10.2196/60647

PMID: 40117573

PMCID: 11971579

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

An interface between ehealth, health literacy and health-related behavior: Qualitative interview study on laypersons experiences with a mobile symptom checker app

  • Roland Koch; 
  • Marie-Theres Steffen; 
  • Anna-Jasmin Wetzel; 
  • Christine Preiser; 
  • Malte Klemmt; 
  • Hans-Jörg Ehni; 
  • Regina Mueller; 
  • Stefanie Joos

ABSTRACT

Background:

Symptom checkers are designed to support their users in recognizing medical symptoms and recommending courses of action. The applications are not yet reliable for self-triage and diagnostics. Users (e-)health literacy plays a role in how symptom checkers are used, but it is unclear how the process from symptom via application input to consulting health care works.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to describe symptom checker use from the perspective of laypersons. Three research questions are addressed: 1) How do users describe the process of using symptom checkers? 2) What are entry points and possible outcomes of symptom checker app use? 3) How are health literacy and e-health literacy expressed during the use of SCA?

Methods:

As part of the CHECK.APP project, 15 medical laypersons were interviewed about their experiences with a specific symptom checker using an interview guideline. The transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using the integrative basic procedure. It combined an analysis of social positioning and agency with Achtziger and Gollwitzer's Rubicon model as concrete heuristics.

Results:

App use corresponds to a cyclic process. Its initiation depends on biographical, social and contextual factors. Users employed symptom checkers for three purposes: Information gathering, action recommendation and communication. They integrate various social, personal and digital resources in their health-related behavior. Their evaluation of the use process depends on context factors, app output and the result of their health-related behavior.

Conclusions:

Health literacy and e-health literacy are expressed at each step of the process, showing that symptom checkers rely heavily on users’ health literacy. To be more effective, symptom checkers should be more transparently integrated in health care. Clinical Trial: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00022465


 Citation

Please cite as:

Koch R, Steffen MT, Wetzel AJ, Preiser C, Klemmt M, Ehni HJ, Mueller R, Joos S

Exploring Laypersons’ Experiences With a Mobile Symptom Checker App as an Interface Between eHealth Literacy, Health Literacy, and Health-Related Behavior: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e60647

DOI: 10.2196/60647

PMID: 40117573

PMCID: 11971579

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.