Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: May 20, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 9, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Telemedicine Service Experience Questionnaire for Chinese Outpatients: Development and Validation Study

Wang P, Zhang K, Chen Y, Zhao M, Li P, Kuang Y, Du Y, Zhu W, Long X, Shi L, Zhu J

Telemedicine Service Experience Questionnaire for Chinese Outpatients: Development and Validation Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e60551

DOI: 10.2196/60551

PMID: 42166784

Telemedicine service experience instrument: development and validation study in Chinese outpatients

  • Peicheng Wang; 
  • Kun Zhang; 
  • Yanhua Chen; 
  • Minan Zhao; 
  • Peiyao Li; 
  • Yi Kuang; 
  • Yanrong Du; 
  • Weiguo Zhu; 
  • Xiao Long; 
  • Leiyu Shi; 
  • Jiming Zhu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telemedicine services represent an emerging healthcare model where patient satisfaction is a crucial indicator of quality and a key driver of telemedicine’s development.

Objective:

To assess the appropriateness of the “Telemedicine Service Experience Questionnaire” (TSEQ) scale as an instrument to measure satisfaction for a broad range of patients across China. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted, on patients who have experienced telemedicine service, to test and validate the factor structures of the TSEQ scale.

Methods:

This study focuses on patients at Peking Union Medical College Hospital who have utilized telemedicine services, employing an adapted “The Chinese Patient Experience Questionnaire” that encompasses 15 questions across 4 dimensions to investigate patients’ telemedicine consultation experiences. Based on this data, the internal consistency and validity of the scale were analyzed, and structural analysis of the scale was conducted using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results:

The exploratory factor analysis on the final 14-item scale resulted in 4 factors. After scrutinizing the content, these factors were labeled “Service Efficiency”, “Post treatment”, “Information Guidance” and “Humanistic Care”, and they demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach alphas 0.876, 0.840, 0.962, and 0.876, respectively). Moreover, the AVE value is greater than 0.5 and the CR value is greater than 0.7, the TSEQ scale has high convergent validity. Our findings suggest that the psychometric properties of the 14-item TESQ are valid and reliable for assessing telemedicine service among Chinese outpatients.

Conclusions:

Our study contributes to the ongoing discourse on telemedicine by providing a validated tool for measuring patient experience and highlighting the essential elements of care that impact patient satisfaction. Future research should aim to address the methodological limitations identified, exploring telemedicine's impact across different demographics and healthcare settings to ensure equitable and effective healthcare delivery.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang P, Zhang K, Chen Y, Zhao M, Li P, Kuang Y, Du Y, Zhu W, Long X, Shi L, Zhu J

Telemedicine Service Experience Questionnaire for Chinese Outpatients: Development and Validation Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e60551

DOI: 10.2196/60551

PMID: 42166784

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.