Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: May 12, 2024
Date Accepted: Feb 22, 2025
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 31, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Oluwole OO, Haggarty N, Ikenyei U, Tinuoye O, Honora A, Issakah MA

Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60464

DOI: 10.2196/60464

PMID: 40163324

PMCID: 12171643

Strategies and tools for EHR and physician workflow alignment: a scoping review protocol

  • Oluwakemi Olufunmilayo Oluwole; 
  • Nicole Haggarty; 
  • Uche Ikenyei; 
  • Oluwabambi Tinuoye; 
  • Andreawan Honora; 
  • Mohammed Abass Issakah

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite the acknowledged potential benefits of electronic health records (EHR) in supporting physicians to achieve efficient care delivery, achieving a fit between physician workflow and EHR has posed a major challenge, leaving negative effects on physician wellbeing and patient outcomes. To this effect, organizations have attempted to align the EHR with physician workflow in various ways yet alignment issues persist. To improve alignment, it is important to understand the different ways in which organizations have tried to achieve this fit, their impacts, and their limitations.

Objective:

This review seeks to identify the strategies and tools that organizations have used to align physician workflow with the EHR and their impacts on EHR-to-physician workflow alignment. This information will serve as a toolkit for healthcare organizations and a knowledge required for the direct application of strategy for optimizing EHR workflow and an opportunity to understand the extent, limitations and gaps in achieving this fit.

Methods:

The scoping review will employ a methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley by searching the literature in 6 steps, and by incorporating the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for transparency. We will include literature reporting on the tools, strategies, and interventions used to align physician workflow to EHR by searching MEDLINE (OVID), MEDLINE (OVID), PUBMED, COCHRANE CINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and WEB of SCIENCE.

Results:

The study is expected to provide healthcare organizations with a toolkit that will help them effectively align physician workflow with EHR. This toolkit will also provide researchers with an opportunity to identify gaps in the literature, which can then lead to further studies on how to better achieve a fit between the two. The report is planned to be submitted to an indexed journal in November 2024.

Conclusions:

These findings will provide insight into the strategies and tools implemented by healthcare organizations to align EHR with physician workflow. Furthermore, this review will assess the effectiveness of these strategies and tools whenever feasible.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Oluwole OO, Haggarty N, Ikenyei U, Tinuoye O, Honora A, Issakah MA

Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60464

DOI: 10.2196/60464

PMID: 40163324

PMCID: 12171643

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.