Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 24, 2024
Date Accepted: Jun 14, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Usability and Acceptability of an App-Based Approach to Treat Low Back Pain: Preplanned Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Kaczorowski S, Trompeter K, Kramer C, Grüneberg C, Thiel C, Donath L, Belavy DL

Usability and Acceptability of an App-Based Approach to Treat Low Back Pain: Preplanned Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59866

DOI: 10.2196/59866

PMID: 40854189

PMCID: 12377697

Usability and acceptability of an app-based approach to treat low back pain: a pre-planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

  • Svenja Kaczorowski; 
  • Katharina Trompeter; 
  • Carolin Kramer; 
  • Christian Grüneberg; 
  • Christian Thiel; 
  • Lars Donath; 
  • Daniel L Belavy

ABSTRACT

Background:

Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability globally. To tackle issues like long wait times and limited access to conventional care, telemedicine is emerging as a viable alternative. It offers benefits like reduced travel and increased flexibility, with evidence showing comparable effectiveness to in-person care. However, usability remains a key challenge, impacting patient compliance.

Objective:

In a three-arm randomised controlled trial, our pre-planned secondary analysis aimed to assess the usability and patient perceptions toward an autonomous app-based intervention ("NOLA") for low back pain in order to improve clinical practice of telemedicine interventions. Objectives included evaluating app usability, assessing perceptions toward telemedicine, and exploring app usage, adherence, and motivation.

Methods:

Low back pain patients were recruited from May to August 2022 and randomised into App, Physio+App, or Physio groups. App and Physio+App groups were included in this sub-analysis. Intervention duration was 6 weeks. Data on baseline characteristics, System Usability Scale, Telemedicine Perception Questionnaire, app usage, adherence, and motivation were collected online.

Results:

64 participants were randomized to use the app with available data for 38. The mean age of participants who completed was 49.9 (SD 13.6) years, with 78% experiencing low back pain for more than two years. Usability scores (0-100) were good (Median (IQR) Physio+App: 78 (58-92), App: 86 (65-91)). Positive telemedicine perceptions were noted with 84% rating it an adequate addition to usual care. App usage varied, with 43% using it three to five days per week, and 64% reported motivation to use the app. The drop-out rates (App: 14/32, 44%; Physio+App: 12/32, 38%; Physio: 11/29, 38%) were similar, but participants who dropped out had statistically significant less pain (completers: mean 3.9 (SD 2.0); drop-outs: mean 3.0 (SD 2.0); P=.02). Reasons for drop-out were mostly not related to the app.

Conclusions:

The app "NOLA" demonstrated good usability, and participants expressed positive perceptions toward telemedicine. Despite concerns about the lack of physical contact, the majority considered telemedicine a convenient form of healthcare delivery. App usage and motivation were favourable, emphasizing the potential of app-based interventions in managing low back pain. Clinical Trial: German Clinical Trial Registry (DRKS00029099)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kaczorowski S, Trompeter K, Kramer C, Grüneberg C, Thiel C, Donath L, Belavy DL

Usability and Acceptability of an App-Based Approach to Treat Low Back Pain: Preplanned Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59866

DOI: 10.2196/59866

PMID: 40854189

PMCID: 12377697

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.