Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Apr 11, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 10, 2024 - Jun 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 19, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Relapse Using Bayesian Networks: Explainable AI Approach

Alves JM, Matos D, Martins T, Cavaco D, Carmo P, Galvão P, Costa FM, Morgado F, Ferreira AM, Freitas P, Dias CC, Rodrigues PP, Adragão P

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Relapse Using Bayesian Networks: Explainable AI Approach

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e59380

DOI: 10.2196/59380

PMID: 39935010

PMCID: 11835785

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Relapse Using Bayesian Networks: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach

  • João Miguel Alves; 
  • Daniel Matos; 
  • Tiago Martins; 
  • Diogo Cavaco; 
  • Pedro Carmo; 
  • Pedro Galvão; 
  • Francisco Moscoso Costa; 
  • Francisco Morgado; 
  • António Miguel Ferreira; 
  • Pedro Freitas; 
  • Cláudia Camila Dias; 
  • Pedro Pereira Rodrigues; 
  • Pedro Adragão

ABSTRACT

Background:

The high prevalence of atrial fibrillation requires the development of reliable methods to determine the probability of success in patients who undergo ablation procedures. Currently, common practise is to rely on medical scores, such as ATLAS, which often require information that is not always available to all patients, thus limiting their practical use. Such limitations could be addressed with adaptable and dynamic artificial intelligence models, provided that they are interpretable for use in clinical practise.

Objective:

This study aims to investigate the potential use of Bayesian networks as clinical decision tools to predict the relapse of atrial fibrillation, prior to a percutaneous PVI procedure.

Methods:

An explainable artificial intelligence model based on Bayesian networks was developed to calculate conditional probabilities of risk based on the clinical condition of each patient. The model was tested for 5, 6 and 7 predictors of atrial fibrillation relapse and validated using four different sampling techniques.

Results:

Model performance in predicting atrial fibrillation relapse was evaluated using as predictors age, sex, smoking, pre-ablation AF type, and obstructive sleep apnea (5 predictors), to which were added body mass index (6) or left atrial volume and epicardial fat (7 predictors). Predictive performances were measured by AUC-ROC at 0.661 (CI 0.603-0.718), 0.703 (CI 0.652-0.753), and 0.752 (CI 0.701-0.800), respectively.

Conclusions:

The model shows acceptable diagnostic accuracy even in the absence of some predictive features, thus providing a valid clinical tool to estimate the risk of relapse of atrial fibrillation with easily available clinical variables. Furthermore, this model can accommodate new risk factors and dynamically learn from new data, hence improving performance as new patient data are added to the model.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Alves JM, Matos D, Martins T, Cavaco D, Carmo P, Galvão P, Costa FM, Morgado F, Ferreira AM, Freitas P, Dias CC, Rodrigues PP, Adragão P

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Relapse Using Bayesian Networks: Explainable AI Approach

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e59380

DOI: 10.2196/59380

PMID: 39935010

PMCID: 11835785

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.