Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Apr 8, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 8, 2024 - May 6, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 16, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Shaping Adoption and Sustained Use Across the Maternal Journey: Qualitative Study on Perceived Usability and Credibility in Digital Health Tools

Ng WY, Lau NY, Lee VV, Vijayakumar S, Leong QY, Ooi SQD, Su LL, Lee YS, Chan SY, Blasiak A, Ho D

Shaping Adoption and Sustained Use Across the Maternal Journey: Qualitative Study on Perceived Usability and Credibility in Digital Health Tools

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e59269

DOI: 10.2196/59269

PMID: 39352732

PMCID: 11480679

Shaping Adoption and Sustained Usage Across the Maternal Journey: Perceived Usability and Credibility in Digital Health Tools

  • Wei Ying Ng; 
  • Ni Yin Lau; 
  • V Vien Lee; 
  • Smrithi Vijayakumar; 
  • Qiao Ying Leong; 
  • Shu Qin Delicia Ooi; 
  • Lin Lin Su; 
  • Yung Seng Lee; 
  • Shiao-Yng Chan; 
  • Agata Blasiak; 
  • Dean Ho

ABSTRACT

Background:

Maternal and child health outcomes are positively influenced with early intervention, and digital health (DH) tools provide the potential for a low-cost and scalable solution such as informational platforms or digital tracking tools. Despite the wide availability of DH tools out there for women pre-to post-pregnancy, user engagement remains low.

Objective:

This study aims to explore the factors that shapes women’s DH adoption and sustained usage across the maternal journey from pre-conception to post-birth, to improve user engagement with DH tools.

Methods:

1-hour semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 44 women from pre- to post-pregnancy (age range: 21-40 years) about their experiences with DH. This study is part of a larger study on women’s maternal experiences with healthcare and DH, and focuses on the factors that affected women’s DH adoption and sustained usage. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results:

Five main themes and ten subthemes were identified that affected women’s adoption and sustained usage of DH tools. These included themes on their pre-existing attitudes to DH, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived credibility and perceived value of the tool.

Conclusions:

Themes that emerged were fully or partially mapped according to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) 2 model. The applicability of the model and need to consider specific cultural nuances in the Asian context (such as the importance of trust and social influence) are discussed. The interaction of the five themes with DH adoption and sustained usage are explored with different themes being relevant at various points of the DH adoption journey. The insights gained serve to inform future DH design and implementation on tools for women to optimise their DH engagement and the benefits they derive from it. Clinical Trial: NCT05099900


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ng WY, Lau NY, Lee VV, Vijayakumar S, Leong QY, Ooi SQD, Su LL, Lee YS, Chan SY, Blasiak A, Ho D

Shaping Adoption and Sustained Use Across the Maternal Journey: Qualitative Study on Perceived Usability and Credibility in Digital Health Tools

JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e59269

DOI: 10.2196/59269

PMID: 39352732

PMCID: 11480679

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.