Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Mar 21, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 3, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Understanding and Addressing Challenges With Electronic Health Record Use in Gynecological Oncology: Cross-Sectional Survey of Multidisciplinary Professionals in the United Kingdom and Co-Design of an Integrated Informatics Platform to Support Clinical Decision-Making

Tookman L, Lear R, Abdullahi Y, Samani A, Averill P, Hunt A, Papadimitriou D, Nkolobe B, Ghaem-Maghami S, Glampson B, McNeish I, Mayer EK

Understanding and Addressing Challenges With Electronic Health Record Use in Gynecological Oncology: Cross-Sectional Survey of Multidisciplinary Professionals in the United Kingdom and Co-Design of an Integrated Informatics Platform to Support Clinical Decision-Making

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e58657

DOI: 10.2196/58657

PMID: 40929723

PMCID: 12422591

Understanding and addressing challenges with Electronic Health Record use in gynaecological oncology: a cross-sectional survey of multidisciplinary professionals in the United Kingdom and co-design of an integrated informatics platform to support clinical decision making.

  • Laura Tookman; 
  • Rachael Lear; 
  • Yusuf Abdullahi; 
  • Amit Samani; 
  • Phoebe Averill; 
  • Ashton Hunt; 
  • Dimitri Papadimitriou; 
  • Baleseng Nkolobe; 
  • Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami; 
  • Ben Glampson; 
  • Iain McNeish; 
  • Erik K Mayer

ABSTRACT

Background:

The benefits and challenges of Electronic Health Record (EHR) use may be particularly significant in complex, high-risk specialties such as gynaecological oncology, yet few studies address the experiences of end-users.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore perspectives on EHR use in gynaecological oncology and to develop an informatics platform for ovarian cancer.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire to capture UK professional experiences of EHR use. Free-text responses were analysed using content analysis; counts and proportions were calculated for quantitative data. An informatics platform was co-designed using human-centred design. Natural language processing was used to extract genomic results and operative details from free-text documentation.

Results:

Of 92 respondents, 84 (92.3%) access multiple electronic systems for clinical decision-making, with 28.6% (26/91) using ≥5 EHR systems. Around 17% (16/92) spend more than 50% of their clinical time looking for information in the EHR. Key challenges relate to fragmentation of the patient record across disparate systems meaning retrieval of pertinent information is often time-consuming. The main benefit of EHR use was perceived to be ease-of-access to patient information, yet 60.0% (54/90) of respondents do not have access to individual patient summaries. Our co-designed ovarian cancer informatics platform brings together patient data from different electronic systems and displays it in a single location to support clinical decision making.

Conclusions:

EHR systems are not currently optimised to support decision-making in gynae-oncology. Co-designed clinical decision support tools could address challenges with data fragmentation and information retrieval towards improvements in the quality and safety of cancer care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tookman L, Lear R, Abdullahi Y, Samani A, Averill P, Hunt A, Papadimitriou D, Nkolobe B, Ghaem-Maghami S, Glampson B, McNeish I, Mayer EK

Understanding and Addressing Challenges With Electronic Health Record Use in Gynecological Oncology: Cross-Sectional Survey of Multidisciplinary Professionals in the United Kingdom and Co-Design of an Integrated Informatics Platform to Support Clinical Decision-Making

JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e58657

DOI: 10.2196/58657

PMID: 40929723

PMCID: 12422591

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.