Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Mar 5, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 8, 2024 - May 3, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 2, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of an Emergency Medicine Asynchronous Learning Platform Usage Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis Study

Briggs B, Mulekar M, Morales H, Husain I

Comparison of an Emergency Medicine Asynchronous Learning Platform Usage Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e58100

DOI: 10.2196/58100

PMID: 39988956

PMCID: 11870596

Comparison of an Emergency Medicine asynchronous learning platform usage before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective analysis

  • Blake Briggs; 
  • Madhuri Mulekar; 
  • Hannah Morales; 
  • Iltifat Husain

ABSTRACT

Background:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic challenged medical educators due to social distancing. Podcasts and asynchronous learning platforms help distill medical education in a socially distanced environment. Medical educators interested in providing asynchronous teaching should know how these methods performed during the pandemic.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of engagement for an emergency medicine (EM) board review podcast and website platform, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured engagement via website traffic, including such metrics as visits, bounce rate, unique visitors, and pageviews. We also evaluated podcast analytics, which included total listeners, engaged listeners, and number of plays.

Methods:

Content was designed after the American Board of EM Model, covering only one review question per episode. Website traffic and podcast analytics were studied monthly from two time periods of 20 months each, pre-pandemic (July 11, 2018, to February 31, 2020) and during the pandemic (May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021). March and April 2020 data were omitted from the analysis due to variations in closure at various domestic and international locations. Results underwent statistical analysis in March 2022.

Results:

132 podcast episodes and 93 handouts were released from July 11, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Mean number of listeners/podcast increased significantly from 2.11 to 3.77 (t test, P<.0001); mean number engaged/podcast increased from 1.72 to 3.09 (t test, P<.0001); and mean number of plays/podcast increased from 42.54 to 69.23 (t test, P=.0122). Similarly, mean number of visits/posting increased from 5.85 to 15.39 (t test, P<.0001); mean number of unique visitors/posting increased from 3.74 to 10.41 (t test, P<.0001); mean number of pageviews/posting increased from 17.13 to 33.32 (t test, P<.0001). Note that, all measures showed decrease from November 2021 to December 2021.

Conclusions:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was increased engagement for our EM board review podcast and website platform over a sustained period, specifically through website visitors and number of podcast plays. Medical educators should be aware of the increasing usage of web-based education tools, and that asynchronous learning is favorably viewed by learners. Limitations include inability to view Spotify analytics during the study period, and confounding factors like increased popularity of social media inadvertently promoting the podcast.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Briggs B, Mulekar M, Morales H, Husain I

Comparison of an Emergency Medicine Asynchronous Learning Platform Usage Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e58100

DOI: 10.2196/58100

PMID: 39988956

PMCID: 11870596

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.