Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 5, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 10, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Electronic Health Interventions and Cervical Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liu X, Ning L, Fan W, Jia C, Lina G

Electronic Health Interventions and Cervical Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58066

DOI: 10.2196/58066

PMID: 39481096

PMCID: 11565089

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Electronic Health Interventions for Cervical Cancer screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Xiaoxia Liu; 
  • Lianzhen Ning; 
  • Wenqi Fan; 
  • Canyi Jia; 
  • Ge Lina

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cervical cancer is an important cause of death in women. Although screening has decreased the mortality of cervical cancer, the screening rates remain suboptimal.

Objective:

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the effectiveness of electronic health intervention for cervical cancer screening.

Methods:

We searched for randomized controlled trials of electronic health interventions promoting cervical cancer screening in adults in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature on Dec. 29, 2023. In addition to doing risk of bias evaluations, two impartial reviewers went over the titles, abstracts, and full-text publications. The Mantel-Haenszel method was utilized in a random-effects model to pool the relative risk for involvement in cervical cancer screening.

Results:

A screen of 713 records identified 14 studies with 23102 participants that were included in the final analysis. The results indicated that electronic health was more effective than control conditions for improving cervical cancer screening rates (RR, 1.464; 95% CI, 1.285–1.667; P < 0.001; I2 = 84.3%); cervical cancer screening (RR, 1.382; 95% CI, 1.214–1.574; P < 0.001; I2 = 82.0%); cervical cancer screening(RR, 1.565; 95% CI, 1.381–1.772; P < 0.001; I2 = 73.6%).

Conclusions:

Given their potential to increase participation in cancer screening, screening programs ought to take electronic health interventions into account. Clinical Trial: CRD42024502884


 Citation

Please cite as:

Liu X, Ning L, Fan W, Jia C, Lina G

Electronic Health Interventions and Cervical Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58066

DOI: 10.2196/58066

PMID: 39481096

PMCID: 11565089

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.