Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Feb 20, 2024
Date Accepted: May 16, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Exploring adolescent healthcare provider perspectives on machine learning suicide risk classification using a mixed-methods approach 
ABSTRACT
Background:
Suicide is a major cause of death for youth aged 10 to 24, necessitating effective risk identification at clinical encounters. While machine learning applied to electronic health records shows promise, further research and application of human-centered design is needed to translate these advances into clinical practice.
Objective:
This study explores pediatric healthcare providers' perspectives on suicide risk models, aiming to inform their design and implementation within the clinical workflow.
Methods:
Using a convergent mixed methods design, we conducted a quantitative survey and individual interviews, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Quantitative data were descriptively analyzed, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Integration of mixed methods was achieved through a joint display, and results were interpreted through a narrative review.
Results:
Thirty-eight participants completed the survey, and six were interviewed. Regarding the integration of a machine learning (ML) risk model into current workflows, 63% of survey respondents preferred alerts only for imminent risk immediately before the patient encounter. Participants preferred a prominent risk notification on the electronic health record (EHR), accompanied by decision-support tools. Approximately 46% of survey respondents expressed the need for ML approaches. Current screening tools pose challenges for patients with low cognitive function and providers. Two-thirds (66%) of survey respondents suggested that designing the EHR-based tool to improve communication between providers could facilitate implementation. Communication with patients and families requires close collaboration, navigating challenges around confidentiality, stigma, and youth-caregiver relationships. Providers expressed concerns about increased demand for mental health services, implications for patient confidentiality, coercive care, inaccurate diagnosis and response, and medical-legal liability.
Conclusions:
There is tentative acceptability and enthusiasm among pediatric healthcare providers for AI risk models to identify suicide risk in adolescents. Successful implementation should incorporate provider perspectives in a user-led fashion to build trust and empower clinicians to respond appropriately to risk flags.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.