Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Feb 19, 2024
Date Accepted: Jul 21, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Can objective data collected through smartphones and wearable devices differentiate and predict depressive states within individuals with depressive disorders: A systematic review of longitudinal studies
ABSTRACT
Background:
Depression is highly recurrent in nature and heterogeneous in individual course. The unobtrusive collection of intensive longitudinal passive data through smartphones and smartwatches might enable the mapping of individual courses of depression, differentiating between various illness states and predicting changes in symptoms, thus improving the self-management of symptoms.
Objective:
The goal of this systematic review is to assess whether objectively measured data collected via smartphones and wearable devices can discriminate among different states of depression and whether they can predict changes in mental health states (remission, relapse, or depressive episodes with their severity of symptoms) within a person.
Methods:
We searched PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies published from 2012 to 2022 that (a) included a smartphone app or wearable device; (b) had participants who were diagnosed with depression; (c) had participants who were ≥14 years; (d) had a minimum duration of 12 weeks of continuous data collection; and (e) articles written in English. This systematic review was pre-registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022355696).
Results:
Out of 12,997 peer-reviewed articles, we found nine original studies that met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies recruited a range of 45 to 2,200 participants. Study durations ranged from 12 weeks to one year. Three studies derived passive longitudinal data from smartphones of participants, one study used a wearable device to generate data, and five studies used both smartphone and wearable device data. For monitoring purposes, a variety of parameters were collected through sensors by different studies. For example, the most collected variables were number of steps per day, total distance moved per day, smartphone usage, call logs, sleep data, heart rate, light exposure, and speech patterns. Discriminating among different states of depression (worsening, relapse, or recovery) was feasible in one study (1 out of 9, 11.1%). Six studies (6 out of 9, 66.7%) demonstrated predicting capabilities of objectively measured data for depressive episodes and/ or symptom severity. Predictive accuracy for measures of depression based on objectively measured data collected via smartphones and wearable devices was reported in four studies and ranged from 79% to 91%.
Conclusions:
Real-time passive monitoring using wearable devices could be utilized to develop personalized self-management approaches. However, significant gaps still exist in this area, including the lack of longitudinal and long-term studies (e.g., > three months), studies lacking confirmatory parameters on an individual level, and studies without a strong correlation between parameters in individual patients to support clinical decision-making. Improvements in reporting standards are highly recommended to provide better-informed insights for clinicians. Throughout this process, there is a clear need to address various other issues, such as limited types of collected data, reliability, user adherence, and privacy concerns. Clinical Trial: Registration number: CRD42022355696
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.