Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 23, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 24, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid–Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences

Elphinston RA, Pager S, Brown K, Sterling M, Fatehi F, Gray P, Hipper L, Cahill L, Conner JP

Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid–Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e57208

DOI: 10.2196/57208

PMID: 39883931

PMCID: 11826952

The first step in co-design of a digital brief intervention to reduce risk of prescription opioid related harm, informed by patient lived experiences: A qualitative analysis

  • Rachel A. Elphinston; 
  • Sue Pager; 
  • Kelly Brown; 
  • Michele Sterling; 
  • Farhad Fatehi; 
  • Paul Gray; 
  • Linda Hipper; 
  • Lauren Cahill; 
  • Jason P. Conner

ABSTRACT

Background:

Opioid medications are important in pain management. Despite this, many patients progress to unsafe medication use. With few personalized and accessible behavioral treatment options to reduce opioid-related harm, new and innovative approaches are urgently needed to fill this gap. Co-design methods offers an opportunity to put patient partners at the centre of the solution.

Objective:

This study involved the first phase of co-design of a digital brief intervention (BI) to reduce opioid-related harm – investigating the lived experience of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in treatment-seeking patients with a particular focus on opioid therapy experiences.

Methods:

Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years, with CNCP at clinically significant intensity (> 4/10). Purposive sampling was used to engage patients on public hospital wait lists via mail, or the treating medical specialist. Participants (N = 18; 10 women; Mage = 49.5+/- SD years) completed semi-structured phone interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, thematically analysed using grounded theory and member checked by patients.

Results:

Eight overarching themes were found (mostleast prominent): Limited treatment collaboration and partnership; Limited biopsychosocial understanding of pain; Continued opioid use when benefits don’t outweigh harms; Trial and error approach to opioid use; Cycles of hopefulness and hopelessness; Diagnostic uncertainty; Significant negative impacts tied to loss; and Complexity of pain and opioid journeys.

Conclusions:

This study advances progress in co-design of digital BIs by actively engaging patient partners in their lived experiences. Key recommendations for consideration in the co-design process should guide personalized solutions to address the complex care needs of patients with CNCP.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Elphinston RA, Pager S, Brown K, Sterling M, Fatehi F, Gray P, Hipper L, Cahill L, Conner JP

Co-Designing a Digital Brief Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Prescription Opioid–Related Harm Among People With Chronic Noncancer Pain: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Lived Experiences

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e57208

DOI: 10.2196/57208

PMID: 39883931

PMCID: 11826952

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.