Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 3, 2024
Date Accepted: Sep 17, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

How Do Scholars Conceptualize and Conduct Health and Digital Health Literacy Research? Survey of Federally Funded Scholars

Sakhuja M, Yelton B, Kavarana S, Schaurer L, Rumthao JR, Noblet S, Arent M, Macauda M, Donelle L, Friedman D

How Do Scholars Conceptualize and Conduct Health and Digital Health Literacy Research? Survey of Federally Funded Scholars

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e57040

DOI: 10.2196/57040

PMID: 39481097

PMCID: 11565084

How Do Scholars Conceptualize and Conduct Health and Digital Health Literacy Research? A Survey of Federally Funded Scholars

  • Mayank Sakhuja; 
  • Brooks Yelton; 
  • Simone Kavarana; 
  • Lauren Schaurer; 
  • Jancham Rachel Rumthao; 
  • Samuel Noblet; 
  • Michelle Arent; 
  • Mark Macauda; 
  • Lorie Donelle; 
  • Daniela Friedman

ABSTRACT

Background:

The concept of health literacy (HL) is constantly evolving and social determinants of health (SDoH) have been receiving considerable attention in public health scholarship. Since a one-size-fits-all approach for HL fails to account for multiple contextual factors and as a result poses challenges in improving literacy levels, there a need to develop a deeper understanding of the current state of HL and DHL research.

Objective:

This study examined scholars’ conceptualization and scope of work focused on HL and digital health literacy (DHL).

Methods:

Using a search string, HL and/or DHL investigators (n=2042) were identified from the grantee websites of NIH RePORTER and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research who were emailed a survey via Qualtrics. Survey questions examined focus of work; whether investigators studied HL/DHL in combination with other SDoH; frameworks, definitions, and approaches used; and research settings.

Results:

Most investigators were from public health (49.7%); 43% reported their research focused on HL alone, 23.8% mentioned DHL, and 33.2% mentioned both. The majority (86.9%) studied HL/DHL in combination with other SDoH; 78.5% conducted HL/DHL work in a community setting; and 64.1% reported not using any specific definition to guide their work. Digital tools (69.9%), plain language materials (61.8%), and visual guides (43.1%) were the top three approaches used. Most worked with adults (95.2%), all races and ethnicities (42.7%), and US populations (65.8%).

Conclusions:

HL and DHL research largely considered SDoH. Multiple HL tools and approaches were employed which support examination and improvement of literacy and communication surrounding healthcare issues.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sakhuja M, Yelton B, Kavarana S, Schaurer L, Rumthao JR, Noblet S, Arent M, Macauda M, Donelle L, Friedman D

How Do Scholars Conceptualize and Conduct Health and Digital Health Literacy Research? Survey of Federally Funded Scholars

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e57040

DOI: 10.2196/57040

PMID: 39481097

PMCID: 11565084

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.