Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
How Do Scholars Conceptualize and Conduct Health and Digital Health Literacy Research? A Survey of Federally Funded Scholars
Mayank Sakhuja;
Brooks Yelton;
Simone Kavarana;
Lauren Schaurer;
Jancham Rachel Rumthao;
Samuel Noblet;
Michelle Arent;
Mark Macauda;
Lorie Donelle;
Daniela Friedman
ABSTRACT
Background:
The concept of health literacy (HL) is constantly evolving and social determinants of health (SDoH) have been receiving considerable attention in public health scholarship. Since a one-size-fits-all approach for HL fails to account for multiple contextual factors and as a result poses challenges in improving literacy levels, there a need to develop a deeper understanding of the current state of HL and DHL research.
Objective:
This study examined scholars’ conceptualization and scope of work focused on HL and digital health literacy (DHL).
Methods:
Using a search string, HL and/or DHL investigators (n=2042) were identified from the grantee websites of NIH RePORTER and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research who were emailed a survey via Qualtrics. Survey questions examined focus of work; whether investigators studied HL/DHL in combination with other SDoH; frameworks, definitions, and approaches used; and research settings.
Results:
Most investigators were from public health (49.7%); 43% reported their research focused on HL alone, 23.8% mentioned DHL, and 33.2% mentioned both. The majority (86.9%) studied HL/DHL in combination with other SDoH; 78.5% conducted HL/DHL work in a community setting; and 64.1% reported not using any specific definition to guide their work. Digital tools (69.9%), plain language materials (61.8%), and visual guides (43.1%) were the top three approaches used. Most worked with adults (95.2%), all races and ethnicities (42.7%), and US populations (65.8%).
Conclusions:
HL and DHL research largely considered SDoH. Multiple HL tools and approaches were employed which support examination and improvement of literacy and communication surrounding healthcare issues.
Citation
Please cite as:
Sakhuja M, Yelton B, Kavarana S, Schaurer L, Rumthao JR, Noblet S, Arent M, Macauda M, Donelle L, Friedman D
How Do Scholars Conceptualize and Conduct Health and Digital Health Literacy Research? Survey of Federally Funded Scholars