Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR AI

Date Submitted: Jan 30, 2024
Date Accepted: May 17, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Generative AI in Medicine: Pioneering Progress or Perpetuating Historical Inaccuracies? Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating Implicit Bias

Sutera P, Bhatia R, Lin T, Chang L, Brown A, Jagsi R

Generative AI in Medicine: Pioneering Progress or Perpetuating Historical Inaccuracies? Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating Implicit Bias

JMIR AI 2025;4:e56891

DOI: 10.2196/56891

PMID: 40605830

PMCID: 12223688

Generative AI in Medicine: Pioneering Progress or Perpetuating Historical Inequities?

  • Philip Sutera; 
  • Rohini Bhatia; 
  • Timothy Lin; 
  • Leslie Chang; 
  • Andrea Brown; 
  • Reshma Jagsi

ABSTRACT

In a pilot experiment, we utilized AI to generate 100 photographs of physicians in 19 medical subspecialties and compared these photographs to the existing and incoming medical specialty workforce. Our work demonstrates that generative AI has a tendency to under represent women in common specialties, and thus the utilization of this tool in the future must be viewed with caution and a lens of known historical bias.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sutera P, Bhatia R, Lin T, Chang L, Brown A, Jagsi R

Generative AI in Medicine: Pioneering Progress or Perpetuating Historical Inaccuracies? Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating Implicit Bias

JMIR AI 2025;4:e56891

DOI: 10.2196/56891

PMID: 40605830

PMCID: 12223688

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.