Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Jan 25, 2024
Date Accepted: May 6, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial

Ferguson I, George G, Narine KO, Turner A, McGhee Z, Bajwa H, Hart FG, Carter S, Beard C

Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2024;11:e56758

DOI: 10.2196/56758

PMID: 39083330

PMCID: 11325113

Acceptability and engagement of a smartphone-delivered interpretation bias intervention in a sample of Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults: an open trial.

  • IreLee Ferguson; 
  • Grace George; 
  • Kevin O Narine; 
  • Amari Turner; 
  • Zelda McGhee; 
  • Harris Bajwa; 
  • Frances G Hart; 
  • Sierra Carter; 
  • Courtney Beard

ABSTRACT

Background:

Access to evidence-based interventions is urgently needed, especially for individuals of minoritized identities who experience unique barriers to mental health care. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have the potential to increase accessibility. Previous pilot studies testing HabitWorks, a smartphone app providing an interpretation bias intervention, have found strong engagement and adherence for HabitWorks; however, previous trials’ samples consisted of predominantly non-Hispanic, White individuals.

Objective:

The current study conducted an open trial of HabitWorks in a community sample of adults who identified as Black and/or Hispanic/Latinx. We aimed to test safety, acceptability, and engagement with the HabitWorks app for Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults.

Methods:

Black and/or Hispanic/Latinx adults (Mage = 32.83; 71.0% women) who endorsed symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were asked to complete interpretation modification exercises via HabitWorks three times per week for one month. Interpretation bias and anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed at baseline and post-treatment. Participants completed qualitative interviews to assess overall perceptions of HabitWorks.

Results:

Of the 31 participants that downloaded the app, 27 used HabitWorks all four weeks. On average, participants completed 15.74 (SD = 7.43) exercises out of the 12 prescribed demonstrating high engagement. Acceptability ratings met all a priori benchmarks except for relevancy. Qualitative interviews also demonstrated high acceptability and few negative experiences. Significant improvements were found in interpretation style (t(30) = 2.29, P < .001) with a large effect size (d =1.53), anxiety symptoms (t(30) = 2.29, P = .03) with a small effect size (d = 0.41), and depression symptoms (t(30) = 3.065, P = .005) with a medium effect size (d = 0.55).

Conclusions:

The current study adds to the literature evaluating DMHIs in Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults. Preliminary results further support a future controlled trial testing the effectiveness of HabitWorks as an intervention.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ferguson I, George G, Narine KO, Turner A, McGhee Z, Bajwa H, Hart FG, Carter S, Beard C

Acceptability and Engagement of a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention in a Sample of Black and Latinx Adults: Open Trial

JMIR Ment Health 2024;11:e56758

DOI: 10.2196/56758

PMID: 39083330

PMCID: 11325113

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.