Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Jan 15, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 23, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Refining Established Practices for Research Question Definition to Foster Interdisciplinary Research Skills in a Digital Age: Consensus Study With Nominal Group Technique

Sedlakova J, Stanikic M, Gille F, Bernard J, Horn AB, Wolf M, Haag C, Floris J, Morgenshtern G, Schneider G, Zumbrunn Wojczyńska A, Mouton Dorey C, Ettlin DA, Gero D, Friemel T, Lu Z, Papadopoulos K, Schläpfer S, Wang N, von Wyl V

Refining Established Practices for Research Question Definition to Foster Interdisciplinary Research Skills in a Digital Age: Consensus Study With Nominal Group Technique

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e56369

DOI: 10.2196/56369

PMID: 39847774

PMCID: 11803332

Refining established practices for research question definition to foster interdisciplinary research skills in a digital age: Consensus study with nominal group technique

  • Jana Sedlakova; 
  • Mina Stanikic; 
  • Felix Gille; 
  • Jürgen Bernard; 
  • Andrea B. Horn; 
  • Markus Wolf; 
  • Christina Haag; 
  • Joel Floris; 
  • Gabriela Morgenshtern; 
  • Gerold Schneider; 
  • Aleksandra Zumbrunn Wojczyńska; 
  • Corine Mouton Dorey; 
  • Dominik Alois Ettlin; 
  • Daniel Gero; 
  • Thomas Friemel; 
  • Ziyuan Lu; 
  • Kimon Papadopoulos; 
  • Sonja Schläpfer; 
  • Ning Wang; 
  • Viktor von Wyl

ABSTRACT

Background:

The increased use of digital data in health research calls for inter- and transdisciplinary collaborations as this data is associated with methodological complexities. This often entails merging the linear deductive approach of health science with the explorative iterative approach of data science. Yet, it is questioned how established health research practices and paradigms should adapt to effectively utilize emerging digital data sources and analytical methods.

Objective:

The present study systematically examined differences and similarities between health sciences and data science using their approaches towards defining research question as an illustrative example.

Methods:

To this end, we conducted a literature search and organized three expert workshops with researchers at the University of Zurich.

Results:

We first developed a glossary to establish a shared understanding of common terminologies and concepts. Subsequently, we delineated the established research workflow for research question formulation, emphasizing "what" and "how," while summarizing the necessary tools for facilitating the process. Finally, we proposed clusters of adaptations to this workflow to integrate essential data science practices, offering recommendations for a pragmatic approach to research question formulation.

Conclusions:

Our findings aim to foster a collective understanding for the systematic adaptation of data science methods in utilizing digital data in health research.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sedlakova J, Stanikic M, Gille F, Bernard J, Horn AB, Wolf M, Haag C, Floris J, Morgenshtern G, Schneider G, Zumbrunn Wojczyńska A, Mouton Dorey C, Ettlin DA, Gero D, Friemel T, Lu Z, Papadopoulos K, Schläpfer S, Wang N, von Wyl V

Refining Established Practices for Research Question Definition to Foster Interdisciplinary Research Skills in a Digital Age: Consensus Study With Nominal Group Technique

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e56369

DOI: 10.2196/56369

PMID: 39847774

PMCID: 11803332

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.