Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 12, 2024
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 12, 2024 - Mar 8, 2024
Date Accepted: Nov 14, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Attitudes of German General Practitioners Toward eHealth Apps for Dementia Risk Reduction: Qualitative Interview Study

Schultz A, Luppa M, Bleckwenn M, Riedel-Heller SG, Zülke AE

Attitudes of German General Practitioners Toward eHealth Apps for Dementia Risk Reduction: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56310

DOI: 10.2196/56310

PMID: 39841983

PMCID: 11799816

German general practitioners’ attitudes towards eHealth applications for dementia risk reduction: Qualitative interview study

  • Adrian Schultz; 
  • Melanie Luppa; 
  • Markus Bleckwenn; 
  • Steffi G. Riedel-Heller; 
  • Andrea E. Zülke

ABSTRACT

Background:

eHealth interventions constitute a promising approach for disease prevention, particularly by facilitating lifestyle changes. Despite being a rather recent development, eHealth interventions might be able to promote brain health and reduce dementia risk in older adults.

Objective:

We aimed to explore the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) on potentials and barriers of respective eHealth interventions for brain health. Understanding the perspective of GPs allows us to identify chances and challenges for implementing eHealth applications for dementia risk reduction.

Methods:

We conducted semi-structured expert interviews with n=9 GPs working in an outpatient setting in and near Leipzig, Germany. Data was fully transcribed and analyzed using a process model of qualitative content analysis with codes and categories being constructed inductively and deductively.

Results:

We found generally favorable but balanced views of eHealth applications for brain health. Eight themes were identified in the data: “addressing dementia”, “knowledge about dementia”, “need for information”, “potentials for prevention”, “chances for applications for prevention”, “development of applications for prevention”, and “barriers of applications for prevention”. GPs talked mostly about how and when to address dementia and the requirements for the implementation of eHealth applications. According to GPs, knowledge about dementia in patients was low, and patients expressed little need for further information in GP practices. Most patients wished for quick information regarding diagnostics, treatment options and progression of the disease.

Conclusions:

GPs want patients to receive relevant and individualized information. It is important for patients to be supported when using eHealth applications, preferably by their general practitioner and their social environment. Concerns were expressed over limited effectiveness, overwhelming patients, limited use in clinical practice and only targeting patients with an already low dementia risk. Clinical Trial: not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Schultz A, Luppa M, Bleckwenn M, Riedel-Heller SG, Zülke AE

Attitudes of German General Practitioners Toward eHealth Apps for Dementia Risk Reduction: Qualitative Interview Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56310

DOI: 10.2196/56310

PMID: 39841983

PMCID: 11799816

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.