Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Dec 15, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 15, 2023 - Jan 17, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis

Ko TK, Tan DJY, Fan KS

Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55535

DOI: 10.2196/55535

PMID: 39145998

PMCID: 11362703

An Evaluation of The Quality and Readability of Online Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose and Throat

  • Tsz Ki Ko; 
  • Denise Jia Yun Tan; 
  • Ka Siu Fan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Foreign body inhalation, ingestion and insertion account for 11% of emergency admissions under Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT). Children are disproportionately affected, and urgent intervention may be needed to maintain airway patency and prevent blood vessel occlusion. High-quality, readable online information could help reduce poor outcomes from foreign bodies.

Objective:

To determine the quality and readability of available online health information relating to foreign bodies.

Methods:

Six search phrases were queried using the Google Search Engine. For each search term, the first 30 results were captured. Websites in the English language and displaying health information were included. The provider and country of origin were recorded. The modified thirty-six-item Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool was used to assess information quality. Readability was assessed using a combination of tools: Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning-Fog Index (GFI), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).

Results:

After removal of duplicates, 73 websites were assessed, with the majority originating from from the United States (63%). Overall, the quality of the content was of moderate quality, with a median EQIP score of 21 (IQR 18-25, max 29) out of a maximum possible score of 36. Precautionary measures were not mentioned on 40% of websites and 30% did not identify disc batteries as a risky foreign body. Red flags necessitating urgent care were identified on 95% of websites, with 89% advising patients to seek medical attention and 38.4% advising on safe foreign body removal. Readability scores (FRES: 12.4 years; FKGL: 6.2; GFI: 6.5; SMOG: 5.9) showed most websites (56%) were below the recommended 6th-grade level.

Conclusions:

The EQIP score suggests that information quality should be improved to provide patients and parents with clear information to help identify high-risk foreign bodies such as disc batteries and magnets, while providing guidance for removal of low-risk foreign bodies. Readability should also be optimised to 6th-grade/12-years-old literacy level where possible. Future research should focus on strategies for improving information quality and readability of information on websites appearing on the first page of search results. Clinical Trial: nil


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ko TK, Tan DJY, Fan KS

Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55535

DOI: 10.2196/55535

PMID: 39145998

PMCID: 11362703

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.