Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Dec 4, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 4, 2023 - Jan 29, 2024
Date Accepted: May 8, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Affecting Specialty Training Preference Among UK Medical Students (FAST): Protocol for a National Cross-Sectional Survey

Ferreira T, Collins AM, French B, Fortescue A, Handscomb A, Plumb E, Bolton E, Feng O

Factors Affecting Specialty Training Preference Among UK Medical Students (FAST): Protocol for a National Cross-Sectional Survey

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e55155

DOI: 10.2196/55155

PMID: 39059007

PMCID: 11316162

Factors Affecting Specialty Training (FAST) preference among UK medical students: study protocol for a national cross-sectional survey

  • Tomas Ferreira; 
  • Alexander M. Collins; 
  • Benjamin French; 
  • Amelia Fortescue; 
  • Arthur Handscomb; 
  • Ella Plumb; 
  • Emily Bolton; 
  • Oliver Feng

ABSTRACT

Background:

The United Kingdom's (UK) medical education system faces a complex landscape of specialty training choices and heightened competition. The Factors Affecting Specialty Training preference (FAST) study addresses the need to understand the factors influencing UK medical students' specialty choices, against a backdrop of increasing challenges in healthcare workforce planning.

Objective:

The primary objectives of the FAST study are to explore UK medical students' preferred specialties and the factors that influence these choices. Secondary objectives are to evaluate students' confidence in securing their chosen specialty, to understand how demographic and academic backgrounds affect their decisions, and to examine how specialty preferences and confidence levels vary across different UK medical schools.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey design was employed to collect data from UK medical students. The survey, comprising 17 questions, uses Likert scales, multiple-choice formats, and free-text entry to capture nuanced insights into specialty choice factors. The methodology, adapted from the AIMS study, incorporates adjustments based on literature review, clinical staff feedback, and pilot group insights. This approach ensures comprehensive and non-directive questioning. Data analysis will include descriptive statistics to establish basic patterns, ANOVA for group comparisons, logistic regression for outcome modelling, and discrete choice models for specialty preference analysis.

Results:

The study launched nationally on December 4, 2023. Data collection is anticipated to end on March 1, 2024, with data analysis beginning thereafter. The results are expected to be available later in 2024.

Conclusions:

The FAST study represents an important step in understanding the factors influencing UK medical students’ career pathways. By integrating diverse student perspectives across year groups and medical schools, this study seeks to provide critical insights into the dynamics of specialty, or residency, selection. The findings are anticipated to inform both policy and educational strategies, aiming to align training opportunities with the evolving needs and aspirations of the future medical workforce. Ultimately, the insights gained may guide initiatives to balance specialty distribution, improve career guidance, and improve overall student satisfaction within the NHS, contributing to a more stable and effective healthcare system.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ferreira T, Collins AM, French B, Fortescue A, Handscomb A, Plumb E, Bolton E, Feng O

Factors Affecting Specialty Training Preference Among UK Medical Students (FAST): Protocol for a National Cross-Sectional Survey

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e55155

DOI: 10.2196/55155

PMID: 39059007

PMCID: 11316162

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.