Accepted for/Published in: Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
Date Submitted: Dec 3, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 19, 2024
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The existence and formation of echo chambers through influential users: a temporal network study of vaccine hesitancy in Taiwan
ABSTRACT
The impact of echo chambers and influential users on information dissemination in social networks is important for health communication to combat vaccine hesitancy. Assessing the temporal development of echo chambers, and the relation that influential users have on their growth, gives insight on effective communication for preventing rise in vaccine hesitancy. In this study, a Taiwanese forum dataset is used, and a multilayer network model is constructed to assess the existence of echo chambers. Each layer represents either pro-vaccination, vaccine hesitant, or anti-vaccination board posts, and their cross-commenting and comment-receiving behaviour is used to measure echo chambering. For understanding the behaviour of influential users – or key nodes – in the network, node degree and PageRank is used, in addition to the conceptualisations of these measurements on a multilevel network. The decreasing homophily between layers over time suggests that there is no existence of echo chambers. Instead, there are increasing cross-cutting exchanges between layers, supporting a “battleground” engagement from both polarised layers on vaccine hesitant boards. When looking at behaviour of hardliners – a type of influential node mostly commenting within their layer – anti-vaccination hardliners are more active in engaging with the vaccine hesitant layer than the pro-vaccination equivalent. When looking at behaviour of high PageRank nodes in a layer, they also mostly engage with the vaccine hesitant layer. The findings suggest that the pro-vaccination layer should increase its efforts to engage with vaccine hesitant individuals. In addition, efforts should be made to target hardliner and influential nodes in the anti-vaccination layer to reduce engagement with the vaccine hesitant layer, preventing sway in the battleground.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.