Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 1, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 1, 2023 - Jan 29, 2024
Date Accepted: Jan 24, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patterns of Internet Use in People Diagnosed With Severe Mental Illness: Qualitative Interview Study

Wadman R, Walker L, Taylor O, Heron P, Newbronner L, Spanakis P, Crosland S, Peckham EJ

Patterns of Internet Use in People Diagnosed With Severe Mental Illness: Qualitative Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e55072

DOI: 10.2196/55072

PMID: 40153777

PMCID: 11992490

Patterns of Internet Use in People with Severe Mental Ill Health: Qualitative Interview Study among People with Severe mental ill Health

  • Ruth Wadman; 
  • Lauren Walker; 
  • Olivia Taylor; 
  • Paul Heron; 
  • Liz Newbronner; 
  • Panagiotis Spanakis; 
  • Suzanne Crosland; 
  • Emily Jane Peckham

ABSTRACT

Background:

People with Severe Mental Ill health (SMI) face profound health inequalities, which may be exacerbated by increased rates of digital exclusion and the movement of health services and provisions to being offered online.

Objective:

To explore internet and digital technology usage for those with SMI, with particular focus on the drivers of the relationship between high internet use and poorer self-reported mental health.

Methods:

We carried out a qualitative interview study with 16 participants with SMI. The participant sample was drawn from a wider investigation of the impacts of the pandemic and restrictions on the health and wellbeing of people with SMI. Data was analysed using framework analysis.

Results:

Participant experiences fell into three broad categories; those who had a positive or neutral online experience, those who had negative or difficult experiences of being online and low users / those with low digital literacy. Of the participants with difficult experiences (those who reported strong unpleasant feelings) our analysis revealed two interesting categories, those with worries and fears related to the online world and those who had difficulty limiting their internet use. Also of note was the description of conscious / mindful interaction with the online world.

Conclusions:

People with SMI (along with the general population) are expected to conduct more of their activities of daily living online in the post pandemic world. This research shows that the majority of internet users with SMI have positive or neutral experiences. However, our typology reveals subgroups of the SMI population for whom there is a relationship between internet use and difficult feelings. These subgroups can be identified by asking questions about online activities, time spent online, feelings, difficulties / issues experienced and use of gambling, dating, adult content, and conspiracy theory websites online. Our conclusions point to further work in collaboration with people with lived experience to modify and test this typology.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wadman R, Walker L, Taylor O, Heron P, Newbronner L, Spanakis P, Crosland S, Peckham EJ

Patterns of Internet Use in People Diagnosed With Severe Mental Illness: Qualitative Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e55072

DOI: 10.2196/55072

PMID: 40153777

PMCID: 11992490

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.