Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Nov 22, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 22, 2023 - Jan 23, 2024
Date Accepted: Apr 22, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: Scoping Review

Taylor B, Hobensack M, Niño de Rivera S, Zhao Y, Masterson Creber R, Cato K

Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: Scoping Review

JMIR Nursing 2024;7:e54810

DOI: 10.2196/54810

PMID: 39028994

PMCID: 11297379

Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: A Scoping Review

  • Brittany Taylor; 
  • Mollie Hobensack; 
  • Stephanie Niño de Rivera; 
  • Yihong Zhao; 
  • Ruth Masterson Creber; 
  • Kenrick Cato

ABSTRACT

Background:

Depression is one of the most common mental disorders that affects over 300 million people worldwide. There is a shortage of providers trained in the provision of mental health care, and the nursing workforce is essential in filling this gap. The diagnosis of depression relies heavily on self-reported symptoms and clinical interviews, which is subject to implicit biases. Omics methods, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and microbiomics, are novel methods for identifying the biological underpinnings of depression. Machine learning is used to analyze genomic data which includes large, heterogeneous, and multidimensional datasets.

Objective:

This scoping review will review the existing literature on machine learning methods for omics data analysis to identify individuals with depression, with the goal of providing insight into alternative objective and driven insights into the diagnostic process for depression.

Methods:

This scoping review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Searches were conducted in three databases to identify relevant publications. Three independent researchers performed screening, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Critical appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies.

Results:

The screening process identified 15 relevant papers. Omics methods included genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, multi-omics, and microbiomics, and machine learning methods included random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and artificial neural network.

Conclusions:

The findings of this scoping review indicate that the omics methods had similar performance in identifying omics variants associated with depression. All machine learning methods performed well based on their performance metrics. When variants in omics data are associated with an increased risk of depression, the important next step is for clinicians, especially nurses, to assess individuals for symptoms of depression, and provide a diagnosis and any necessary treatment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Taylor B, Hobensack M, Niño de Rivera S, Zhao Y, Masterson Creber R, Cato K

Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: Scoping Review

JMIR Nursing 2024;7:e54810

DOI: 10.2196/54810

PMID: 39028994

PMCID: 11297379

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.