Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Serious Games

Date Submitted: Nov 20, 2023
Date Accepted: May 31, 2024
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jun 20, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Impact of Facilitation on Cognitive Flow in a Novel Diabetes Management Rehearsal Game for Health Professions Education: Mixed Methods, Open-Label, Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Tan JW, Tan G, Xia L, Chong DKS, Rajalingam P, Dalan R, Mogali SR

Impact of Facilitation on Cognitive Flow in a Novel Diabetes Management Rehearsal Game for Health Professions Education: Mixed Methods, Open-Label, Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Serious Games 2024;12:e54703

DOI: 10.2196/54703

PMID: 38900700

PMCID: 11292155

The Impact of Facilitation on Cognitive Flow in a Novel Diabetes Management Rehearsal Game for Health Professions Education: Mixed Methods Study

  • Jun Wen Tan; 
  • Gabriel Tan; 
  • Lian Xia; 
  • Darren Kai Siang Chong; 
  • Preman Rajalingam; 
  • Rinkoo Dalan; 
  • Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali

ABSTRACT

Background:

Though the prevalence of diabetes is set to increase, most serious game solutions typically target patient self-management and education. Few games target healthcare professions education, and even fewer consider the factors that may increase their efficacies. The impact of facilitation, a prominent feature of health professions education, is examined in the context of a rehearsal-based diabetes management serious game.

Objective:

In this mixed-methods open label superiority randomised-controlled trial, we compare student performance, attitudes, and perceptions of a rehearsal-based diabetes management game for healthcare professionals.

Methods:

Student participants were randomised into two groups to play a diabetes management game. The control group played the game alone, and the intervention group played the same game alongside a facilitator tasked to moderate overall challenge levels and address queries. Both groups were administered the Flow Short Scale (FSS), a 13-item measure rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not at all”) to 7 (“very much”) immediately after the game. Students were then invited to voluntary focus group discussions to elicit their attitudes and perceptions of the game. Findings were subject to between-group comparisons and inductive thematic analysis respectively.

Results:

A total of 48 (26 control, 22 intervention) clinical-year undergraduates from the Lee Kong Chian School of medicine in Singapore participated in the study, with 18 continuing to the focus group discussions. FSS results indicated superiority of the intervention group for overall Flow (t = -2.17, P = .04) and the Absorption subdomain (t = -2.6, P = .01). Qualitative results indicated students viewed facilitation as helpful, appropriate, were able to identify improvable elements of the game’s theoretical foundations and overall design.

Conclusions:

While serious games are efficacious means of rehearsing previously learned knowledge, facilitation allows for their efficiency to be greatly increased. Such increases are likely crucial in the coming the years with the increased digitisation of healthcare professions education and prevalence of diabetes. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05637749; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05637749


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tan JW, Tan G, Xia L, Chong DKS, Rajalingam P, Dalan R, Mogali SR

Impact of Facilitation on Cognitive Flow in a Novel Diabetes Management Rehearsal Game for Health Professions Education: Mixed Methods, Open-Label, Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Serious Games 2024;12:e54703

DOI: 10.2196/54703

PMID: 38900700

PMCID: 11292155

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.