Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Nov 16, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 16, 2023 - Jan 11, 2024
Date Accepted: May 22, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of Mobile Technologies to Streamline Pretriage Patient Flow in the Emergency Department: Observational Usability Study

Wang P, Yu L, Li T, Zhou L, Ma X

Use of Mobile Technologies to Streamline Pretriage Patient Flow in the Emergency Department: Observational Usability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e54642

DOI: 10.2196/54642

PMID: 38848554

PMCID: 11193078

The use of mobile technologies to streamline pre-triage patient flow in the emergency department

  • Panzhang Wang; 
  • Lei Yu; 
  • Tao Li; 
  • Liang Zhou; 
  • Xin Ma

ABSTRACT

Background:

In overcrowding emergency departments (EDs), triage nurses spend too much time on paperwork related to patient registration, which impedes timely identification. With self-service technologies, triage nurses could focus on high-order tasks. Kiosks have barriers to direct patient flow spatially, socially, and clinically.

Objective:

To use mobile technologies to improve pre-triage flow in EDs.

Methods:

The proposed system welcomed each ambulatory arrival using quick response codes, which were posted just outside the walk-in entrance. Patients or their proxies could scan to complete self-registration. Upon submission, the result was saved locally on smartphones instead of uploading over the internet. As code readers were popularly used in hospitals, triage nurses could automatically read these data in and save time for recollection. The study was conducted at a busy metropolitan ED, with an annual census of 306,000. Both kiosks and smartphones were evaluated randomly while being used to moderate pre-triage patient flow.

Results:

Overall, 2,180 patients registered on kiosks and 2,695 arrivals checked in using their smartphones. By comparing kiosks to smartphones, there was a statistically significant difference in referring (49.72% [1,084] vs. 8.79% [237]; difference, 40.93%; 95% CI, 38.58%-43.29%; p < 0.001) and throughput (68.22% [53.95] vs. 86.46% [66.75]; difference, 18.17%; 95% CI, 5.38%-30.96%; p < 0.001). There was no statistically difference in completion time (1.3±0.51 minutes vs. 1.41±0.26 minutes; p = 0.33). For patient ratings, there was a statistically significant difference in usability satisfaction (4.41±1.47 vs. 6.67±0.7; p < 0.001), time satisfaction (4.45±1.37 vs. 6.75±0.61; p < 0.001), and support satisfaction (4.86±1.93 vs. 6.63±1.09; p < 0.001). For nurse ratings, the difference was also statistically significant (10% vs. 100%; p < 0.001). A modified queueing model was identified and qualitative findings were grouped by sequential steps.

Conclusions:

This study suggests patient-carried smartphones as a tool for ED self-registration. With increased usability and the tailored queueing model, it poses to minimize pre-triage waiting for ED patients.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang P, Yu L, Li T, Zhou L, Ma X

Use of Mobile Technologies to Streamline Pretriage Patient Flow in the Emergency Department: Observational Usability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e54642

DOI: 10.2196/54642

PMID: 38848554

PMCID: 11193078

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.