Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Nov 13, 2023
Date Accepted: Jun 25, 2024

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Current Status of Barriers to mHealth Access Among Patients With Stroke and Steps Toward the Digital Health Era: Systematic Review

Niyomyart A, Ruksakulpiwat S, Benjasirisan C, Phianhasin L, Nigussie K, Thorngthip S, Shamita G, Thampakkul J, Begashaw L

Current Status of Barriers to mHealth Access Among Patients With Stroke and Steps Toward the Digital Health Era: Systematic Review

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e54511

DOI: 10.2196/54511

PMID: 39173152

PMCID: 11377914

Barriers to m-Health Access Among Patients with Stroke: Current Status and Steps Towards the Digital Health Era — A Systematic Review

  • Atsadaporn Niyomyart; 
  • Suebsarn Ruksakulpiwat; 
  • Chitchanok Benjasirisan; 
  • Lalipat Phianhasin; 
  • Kabtamu Nigussie; 
  • Sutthinee Thorngthip; 
  • Gazi Shamita; 
  • Jai Thampakkul; 
  • Lidya Begashaw

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mobile health (m-Health) offers significant benefits for stroke patients, facilitating remote monitoring and personalized healthcare solutions beyond traditional settings. However, there's a dearth of comprehensive data, particularly qualitative insights, on the barriers to m-Health access. Understanding these barriers is crucial for devising strategies to enhance m-Health utilization among stroke patients.

Objective:

This study aims to examine the recent literature focusing on barriers to m-Health access for stroke patients.

Methods:

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus Full Text was conducted for literature published between 2017 and 2023. Abstracts and full texts were independently screened based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data synthesis was performed using the convergent integrated analysis framework recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute.

Results:

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were qualitative studies (about 42%), followed by mixed methods (25%), pilot studies (about 17%), non-randomized control trials (about 8%), and observational studies (about 8%). Participants included stroke patients, caregivers, and various healthcare professionals. The most common m-Health practices were home-based telerehabilitation (30%) and post-stroke m-Health and telecare services (20%). Identified barriers encompassed health-related issues, patient acceptance, infrastructure challenges (including software, networking, and hardware), support system deficiencies, time constraints, and data privacy and security concerns.

Conclusions:

This systematic review underscores significant barriers to m-Health adoption among stroke patients. Addressing these barriers in future research is imperative to ensure that m-Health solutions effectively meet patients' needs. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Niyomyart A, Ruksakulpiwat S, Benjasirisan C, Phianhasin L, Nigussie K, Thorngthip S, Shamita G, Thampakkul J, Begashaw L

Current Status of Barriers to mHealth Access Among Patients With Stroke and Steps Toward the Digital Health Era: Systematic Review

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e54511

DOI: 10.2196/54511

PMID: 39173152

PMCID: 11377914

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.