Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 25, 2023 - Dec 20, 2023
Date Accepted: Feb 10, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Clinical Decision Support System Used in Spinal Disorders: Scoping Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Spinal disorders are highly prevalent worldwide with high socio-economical costs. This cost is associated with the demand for treatment and productivity loss, prompting the exploration of technology to improve patient outcomes. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are computerised systems that are increasingly used to facilitate safe and efficient healthcare. Its application ranges in depth and can be found across healthcare specialities.
Objective:
This review aimed to explore the use of CDSSs for patients with spinal disorders.
Methods:
We used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping review and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews. Included studies examined the use of digitalised CDSSs for patients with spinal disorders.
Results:
Four major CDSS functions were identified from 31 studies: preventing unnecessary imaging (n = 8), diagnosis (n = 6), prognosis (n = 11), and treatment recommendation (n = 6). Most studies utilised the knowledge-based system. Logistic regression was the most employed method followed by decision tree algorithms. The use of CDSSs to aid in the management of spinal disorders was generally accepted over feelings of threat to physicians' clinical decision-making autonomy.
Conclusions:
Although effectiveness was frequently evaluated by examining the agreement between CDSS and healthcare providers' decisions, a preferable comparison would be to compare the CDSS recommendations with actual clinical outcomes. Additionally, future studies on CDSS development should focus on system integration, considering end-user’s needs and preferences, as well as external validation and impact studies, to assess effectiveness and generalisability.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.