Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 27, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 27, 2023 - Nov 22, 2023
Date Accepted: Mar 16, 2024
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Preference With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2021-2022: Survey Among Patients With Chronic Pain

Harnik MA, Scheidegger A, Blättler L, Nemecek Z, Sauter TC, Limacher A, Reisig F, grosse Holtforth M, Streitberger K

Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Preference With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2021-2022: Survey Among Patients With Chronic Pain

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e53154

DOI: 10.2196/53154

PMID: 38684086

PMCID: 11060324

Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Preference with Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic 2021-2022: Survey among Patients with Chronic Pain

  • Michael Alexander Harnik; 
  • Alina Scheidegger; 
  • Larissa Blättler; 
  • Zdenek Nemecek; 
  • Thomas C. Sauter; 
  • Andreas Limacher; 
  • Florian Reisig; 
  • Martin grosse Holtforth; 
  • Konrad Streitberger

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many healthcare providers to make changes in the treatments they offer. We evaluated acceptance of telemedicine and preferences.

Objective:

The primary aim was to evaluate the acceptance of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Further, to assess patients’ preferences and correlation between acceptance and satisfaction, pain, general condition, perception of telemedicine, and catastrophizing.

Methods:

Anonymous cross-sectional survey between 27/01/2021 and 04/02/2022, enrolling outpatients. Descriptive analysis of acceptance of telemedicine and investigation of patients’ preferences. Further, Spearman correlation and a chi-squared test for categorical data, with Cramer’s V statistic to assess effect sizes.

Results:

Our survey was completed by 60 patients. Telemedicine acceptance was high, with an average of 7.6±3.3 (on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 = not at all to 10 = completely), and respondents generally preferred on-site consultations over telemedicine (58.3% vs. 40.0%). A subgroup analysis revealed that respondents who already had received a phone consultation, showed higher preference for telemedicine (50.0% vs. 16.7%; X2 (2, n=60) = 7.5, P=.024, Cramer's V=.354), as well as those who had been treated for more than 3 months (54.8% vs. 24.1%; X2 (2, n=60) = 6.5, P=.039, Cramer's V=.329).

Conclusions:

Acceptance of telemedicine was high, but patients preferred on-site consultations. Preference for telemedicine was markedly higher in patients who had already received phone consultations or who had been treated for longer than 3 months. In times of COVID-19, the modality of patient care should be discussed on an individual basis. Clinical Trial: No registration.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Harnik MA, Scheidegger A, Blättler L, Nemecek Z, Sauter TC, Limacher A, Reisig F, grosse Holtforth M, Streitberger K

Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Preference With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2021-2022: Survey Among Patients With Chronic Pain

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e53154

DOI: 10.2196/53154

PMID: 38684086

PMCID: 11060324

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.